DUFF & NONSENSE!

The real war

This post continues from the last in which I urged caution in exactly how we re-act to Islamic terrorism on our shores.  I start on the basis that it is always necessary to treat governments with suspicion - especially one's own!  As our current election has shown, and as the last American one confirmed, our politicians are not very bright.  Of course, it's easy to be condescending because as private subjects (or citizens), we are not required to wrestle with the complexities of various desperately intricate policy decisions which we leave to the politicians.  However, when those decisions begin to shift the parameters of individual liberty then "we the people" (to quote a phrase) need to be exceedingly alert.  That is not to say that nothing must be changed to deal with new circumstances, our own people being slaughtered on our own streets is intolerable and, to quote yet another well-known phrase, "something must be done!"  However, it is critical that whatever legal or political changes ensue they must be intelligent and they must produce results, not further and greater problems. 

In the meantime it is necessary to keep an eye on the larger picture far outside the shores of this 'septic Isle', so it is extremely useful that The Spectator has reprinted an article by Douglas Murray first published on 2014 which points to the very heart of the Islamic problem - the war, and it really is a war, between Sunni Saudi Arabia and Shia Iran.  The timing of this reprint, which is an absolute 'MUST READ', is impeccable given the somewhat startling news in the last two days that Saudi has taken extreme measures, short of war but only just, against Quatar and other Gulf States.  The attitude of the West to this coming conflict is, to say the least, exceedingly tricky.  Under Obama, the USA backed Iran and the Shias but now Trump has shifted to the Saudi side.  There is, it seems to me, a rank and ignorant outsider, little to choose between them.  But, dammit, that's what politics is all about - choosing!  Happily, sort of, our input is, and will remain, minimal - but that will not save us from the tsunami that might arise.

 

 

Hard a'starboard, 'Admiral' Trump!

Well, whatever else you can say about 'The Donald', he's not afraid to take decisions!  Of course, like just about every other President, one cannot be sure of the wisdom until all those bloody "events, dear boy, events" work themselves out.  Whatever, from now on it's farewell Iran, hello Saudi Arabia!

How much easier life was back in, er, 'the good old days' when one simply dismissed all Muslims as scallywags and one just got on with the job of bossing them all about.  Now, one has to choose which particular scallywag to support and which one to denigrate.  Obama had his eight year 'love in' with the Persians and a fat lot of good it did him.  In their usual dextrous fashion they relieved him of oodles of cash and did nothing in return.

Anyway, now it's the Saudi's turn to bask in the American sunlight but at least they seem to be willing to pay for it which is extraordinary given that American fracking will eventually force them into bankruptcy!  So from now on it's 'up the Sunnis' and 'down with the Shias', er, or is that the other way round?  I dunno but I'm sure 'The Donald does!

 

The Sunday Rumble: 21.5.17

Aaaaaargh, it's that wedding again!   I shuffle up here to my attic, switch on this computer-thingie in order to read the Sunday papers (without which, of course, I would have no opinions about anything) and all I see is page after page after page telling me about 'The Wedding' - which is the one thing I already have an opinion on!  My dears, the whole thing looked ghastly and the 'yuuuuge' number of kiddie-winkies let loose to inflict their mayhem obviously required the use of several Tasers!  Sorry to be grumpy but obviously my invitation went astray in the post so I am not inclined to be generous!

 

The vicar's daughter reminds us of biblical truth:   'The good lord giveth and the good lord taketh away' - or something like that, my biblical studies, like the rest of my studies, were never very good.  Anyway, that Mrs. May, having come on as more socialist than Aneurin Bevan suddenly whips out her cosh and gives us poor, old-age pensioners a whack.  Apparently, the £300-odd quid that that nice, well brought up, Mr. Cameron used to send me and the missus every winter to pay for a sack of coal to keep us warm in the winter, is to be stopped.  I am shocked, I tell you, shocked!  Come back, Dave, I never meant to call you 'dim'!

 

That Peter Hitchens 'is a very naughty boy':   It's worth reading him in The Mail on Sunday because it saves you the trouble of taking a cold shower!  After dishing out various kicks and punches aimed at our sloppy thinking he ends his commentary today by providing a tip as to who is up and who is down in the 'Power Stakes'.  He suggests that you should watch and note who visits whom.  The one who visits is the junior, as in President Macron visits 'Mutti' Merkel, and 'The Donald' visits the king of Saudi Arabia.  'Nuff said!

 

"The horror, oh, the horror":   There is some advantage in living in a rain-swept, chilly island when you consider that yesterday, in 'San Fran' (where else?) they had a "Summer of Love" parade in which the participants were stark naked.  And no, nothing on earth would induce me to publish photos of the event.

 

Fox is fuxed:   A few years ago when I was able to contribute to the upkeep of my 'ex-Best Friend', Rupe, and his sundry wives, I used to be a keen watcher of Fox News.  One of my favourite programmes was called "The Five" in which five commentators discussed current events.  Obviously, Fox being Fox, most of them were Right-wingers but they always had a 'stat-Leftie' present in the somewhat unlovely shape of Bob Beckel.  I liked him because he raised grumpiness to new levels.  He was also, on occasions, quite funny but his disdain for all things conservative was often vituperative.  Last week, this doyen of the progressive movement was fired - for making racist remarks to a black employee  Simply too, too delicious!

 

Oh no - say it ain't so!   Having ducked and dived my way through the saturation coverage of Pippa's wedding, suddenly a thought occurred - Harry and Meghan are probably next!  I think I may sail round the world on one of those titchy sailing boats!

 

Find that brolly fast!   The Met Office is forecasting a heatwave - and we all know what that means!

 

Tragedy or farce?   There is a small story in The Telegraph concerning a South African hunter who was crushed to death by an elephant.  He was a professional hunter leading a party of his customers when they blundered into a herd of elephants which went berserk.  One of them lifted the man using its trunk but was then shot and in collapsing crushed the man to death.  I confess that at first I smiled but then I learned that the man had five children and so I gave myself a slap!  What do you think?

 

No more rumbles today

 

 

Obama gives Macron a French kiss - eeeeeew!

Does this pompous poke-nose have nothing better to do these days except interfere in other nations' elections?  Has he learned nothing from our Brexit referendum in which he raised his snooty nose and told us Brits that we would be at the end of the queue if we had the temerity to ignore his sonorous words?  Needless to say, he received the traditional 'archers' salute' by way of reply!  Actually, I'm surprised he has the time given all that golf he has to play, plus ultra-long holidays in swank joints in Hawaii despite his expressed worries for his daughter who is 'home alone' in 'Noo Yawk'!  Plus, of course, he has been busy cashing in all those hefty cheques he earned 'boring for America' at the behest of sundry 'zillionaires'.

Mind you, I forgive him everything for the example he has set for nouveau riches everywhere!   Take a look at the proposed 'Barack Obama Presidential Center' which, of course, is absolutely and definitely not a vanity project, oh, dear me, no, this will be a "transformational project for this community".  The community concerned is the South Side' of that haven of peace and tranquillity, er, Chicago, actually - yeeeees, quite! 

 

'Still 'n' all', as they say 'over there', if this, er, 'transformational project' manages to bring down the local murder rate to somewhere close to that of, say, Baghdad, then it will all have been worth while.  Mr. Thomas Lifson at The American Thinker (who is, of course, a very naughty boy!) is very taken with the, er, whiteness of it all. 

How all that whiteness will do over the years, as soot, grime, brutal winters, and acid rain take their toll is unknown. Future generations will get to draw their own conclusions.

 I suppose, given the news that Iran has just increased its defence budget by 145% courtesy of Obama's kindness/'stoopidity' (you choose), then the fact that within a generation it will look like one of Valerie Jarret's slum blocks will indeed be a tribute to this former Chicago community advisor!

 

 

History writing at its very best

I have finally reached the end of Dr. Christopher M. Bell's excellent history entitled Churchill and the Dardenelles and I cannot recommend it too highly.  Even thinking about how much sheer, hard, slogging graft it must have taken to plough through the volumes of documentation involved is almost enough to send me to bed for a week!  Not, mind you, that it was hard work reading it, on the contrary, Dr. Bell's pellucid prose remained crystal clear even as he strove to summarise even-handedly disparate events from disparate witnesses.  The book is an example of history writing at its very best.

 

When, in an earlier post, I mentioned that I was starting to read this book, I offered my opinion (as an ex-Corporal!) that anyone who thought that in 1915 they could drive warships 60-odd miles up an exceedingly narrow waterway against opposition on both banks was utterly bonkers.  Having read Dr. Bell's book my opinion is confirmed and the only surprise is that the mythical Field Marshall's baton which is said to reside in the knapsack of every soldier was not offered to me formally during my otherwise less than conspicuous service! I hasten to add that Dr. Bell is more circumspect in his conclusions.

Yesterday was ANZAC Day so it was an appropriate time for me to complete the reading of this book.  As Dr. Bell makes clear, Churchill, as First Lord of the Admiralty, was not a prime-mover in the landing of troops in Gallipoli and the gross slaughter that ensued could not be laid at his door but, of course, it was his naval adventure that set the scene and after that it was a classic case of "events, dear boy, events!" taking over. 

What is even more fascinating than the actual combat was the even more 'bloody combat' that ensued as all the leading actors strove after the event to justify their decisions and actions.  The book offers a truly masterful summary of the differing versions by different 'actors' which were offered up, especially by Churchill, to justify their parts in the tragic disaster.  Today we talk of 'alt-truth' and 'fake news' but do not under any circs think they are just a modern phenomenon.  Churchill, in particular, was a master of it!

If the art, and craft, of war and politics fascinates you, as it does me, then read this book.

 

 

Churchillian madness

Following my introductory post a few days ago on the subject of the Dardenelles campaign in 1915, I have moved with agonising slowness to Chapter 7 of Christopher M. Bell's excellent book "Churchill and the Dardenelles", in fact, I am almost as slow as the Royal Navy's approach was to this enormously ticklish operation!  The first thing that is worth studying is a map of the area:

 

 

Now regular readers of this blog will be aware that I write on naval affairs with all the expertise of an ex-Corporal - yeeeeees, quite!  So, I am entirely happy for any ex-matelots to correct me.  Anyway, the idea was to sail some British battleships and cruisers up those Straights and into the Sea of Marmara and then, all being well, on again into the Black Sea to join hands with our Russian allies.

 

Be honest - 'wotcha fink?'

 

Well, my reaction was and is that the whole scheme was utter crackpot lunacy!  Both sides of the Straights had forts and heavy gun emplacements built along them, plus hundreds of lighter and more manoeuvrable army howitzers, to say nothing of a huge collection of mines and, just to add another defensive 'delicacy', built-in and camouflaged torpedo tubes on both banks.  Did Winston Churchill, then First Lord of the Admiralty, with all the experience of a junior cavalry officer(!), seriously believe that the Navy could fight those ships through that obvious death trap?  Well, yes, he did!  What is worse is that virtually none of the senior Admiralty staff, including no less a figure that Jacky Fisher, was prepared to scotch the madness at the very beginning.

 

So the momentum built in the full knowledge of the fact that the Navy only had half a dozen converted trawlers to act as minesweepers and around 4 - 6 aircraft to act as spotters for the ships guns attempting to hit targets they could not see.  Fisher's opposition grew as the operation hit the obvious brick wall to which it was steaming but he still lacked the determination to resign as First Sea Lord.  Even so, it became clear that the only way to force a passage through the Straights was to deploy the army mostly on the northern bank in order to clear the gun emplacements - and there began the greatest tragedy of this useless farrago.

 

I will report again when I have advanced beyond Chapter 7!  In the meantime, buy the book, it is grim but it is illuminating.

 

 

 

The Sunday Rumble: 9.4.17

Jolly Good Show!   Yes, I am delighted to report that that awfully decent British chap, Mr. Lewis Hamilton, held off that damned pushy Hun into second place at the Chinese Grand Prix.  Unfortunately, due to my falling out with my ex-best friend, Rupe, because of his exorbitant charges, I was unable to watch the race on TV this morning but the BBC did an excellent job via the radio commentary.  And for the third day running we have a cloudless, sunny morning - hoorah!

 

Sod's Law will strike!   Apropos my last remark above, I have just been sitting on my patio drinking my coffee (and it's only April, for God's sake!) and the 'Memsahib' remarked that the sunshine had brought out so many insects including some beautiful butterflies.  Being a miserable Brit, of course, I instantly responded by reminding her that next week temperatures will almost certainly plummet and rain, if not snow, will certainly fall and kill off all the insects.  She simply rolled her eyes which I think was very disrespectful!

 

"Churchill and the Dardenelles":   Just bought this book by Christopher M. Bell which has received rave reviews.  To be honest, I know very little of this campaign (or mega-cock-up, if you prefer) so I am looking forward to learning something.  I gather that the author had to hack his way through a jungle of myths and lies and distortions in order to reach some sort of balanced judgment as to who was to share the blame.  Mind you, there is some sardonic humour to be had from the fact that even a hundred years ago, 'fake news', spin and good, old-fashioned lying were still the weapons of first resort!  I will provide some further commentary as I work myself into the book.

 

Dan Hodges tells it the way it is:   If you are a member of the Labour party, either an MP, or a local party official, or just a card-carrying member, then you should resign the whip, tear up your card, cancel your membership and stop your payments to the party.  Why?  Because, in effect, and following the farrago of the anti-Semitic Ken Livingstone being let off with a caution, today's Labour party is no better than Oswald Mosley's Blackshirts.  Read it and weep!

 

And if one cold shower isn't enough, try this:   Peter Hitchens in The Mail re-enforces the fact that so far there is absolutely no 'proof positive' that Assad was responsible for the chemical attack that prompted 'The Donald' to loose off dozens of rockets.  In fact he goes further by emphasising that most of the information (I wouldn't call it 'news') emanates from the murderous rascals who control the locale where the 'attack' took place.  Does 'The Donald' know something we do not, I wonder?  Or did he just get out of bed on the wrong side again?

 

Oh no!  Now I will have to choose!   Dammit!  I have only read the introduction to the Dardanelles book I mentioned above and already it is clear that I will have to choose between two of my 'heroes'.  To be honest, I had forgotten that Jackie Fisher was First Sea Lord at the time and he is one of my all-time 'heroes' because he, almost single-handedly, succeeded in dragging the Royal Navy into the 20th century.  Now I learn that he and my other 'hero', Winston Churchill, were at daggers drawn over the Dardanelles fiasco and each spun furiously against the other.  Who to choose?  Better finish the book first, I suppose!

 

I almost forgot The Good News:   How could I have let this slip by without a comment and a bloody big 'HOORAH'!  Justice Gorsuch has made it on to the Supreme Court.  Now all we need is for Justice Ginsberg to catch a cold and retire and the Republicans can lock down a conservative majority on the court for decades to come.

 

No more rumbles

 

 

Don't do it, Donald!

Before I make my main point, here's a question that is niggling away at the back of what passes for my mind.  Why is using gas as a weapon considered to be more evil than using high explosive?  I admit that I, too, find it repulsive but I can't quite work out why.  Anyway, the usual 'shlock-horror' news reports have followed Assad's decision to use it in an attack on his own Syrian people.  The other question that hovers is why?  It has provoked the 'The Donald' and, I would guess, 'Vlad the Impaler', too.  Where's the gain?

Two writers, Stephen and Shoshana Bryen, ponder the question at The American Thinker but come to no convincing explanation.  Assad's murderous attack came shortly after an American announcement that they were pulling back on confrontation with Assad in order to concentrate on their main aim of destroying ISIS.  The Bryens suggest that with American pressure off, Assad was fearful that 'Vlad' would ditch him and perhaps let his country "cantonize" into separate ethnic regions just so long as Russian bases were safeguarded.  In any event, Russian support for a separate Kurdish autonomy must have irked Assad enormously.

Now, Assad has provoked 'The Donald' into almost warlike fervour which will push 'Vlad' back into his arms.  At least, that's the theory, or one of the theories, to explain an act of seemingly total irrationality.  'The Donald' needs to think his response through very, very carefully which will not be easy considering his tendency to lose defence advisers at an almost weekly rate!  I can't help wondering if he is already pissed off with this politics lark which is already proving exceedingly tricky.  Yes, he enjoys the pomp and circumstance but for how long will he put up with the sheer intractability of the problems he faces?

 

 

A Texas 'Sheikdown'!

According to A E-P in The Telegraph, those 'good ol' boys down Texas way' are at it again.  'Ahab the Arab' tried flooding the market with oil/gas in order to drive down the price and put those pesky Texans with their cheap-as-sand shale gas out of business but, alas, American technology came to the rescue and those 'cowboys' simply produced the stuff even cheaper!

Now, 'Ahab the Arab' plus his partner in crime good friend, 'Vlad the Impaler', have done their very best to cut oil/gas production in order to drive up the price.  As a perfect example of the truth in 'ur wee Rabbie's' famous poem,  “The best laid schemes o' mice an' men / Gang aft a-gley”, the 'good ol' boys of Texas' kept on innovating so that now their oil and gas is even cheaper and they have now discovered that there are zillions and squillions more of it than had ever been thought possible.

The Opec oil cartel is waking up to an unpleasant surprise. Shale output from the Permian Basin in Texas is expanding faster than the world thought humanly possible.

The scale threatens to neutralise output cuts agreed by Saudi Arabia and a Russian-led bloc last November, and ultimately threatens to break their strategic lockhold on the global crude market for a generation.

"People just don't seem to realise how big the Permian is. It will eventually pass the Ghawar field in Saudi Arabia, and that is the biggest in the world," said Scott Sheffield, founder of Pioneer Natural Resources and acclaimed 'King of the Permian'.

What can one say to our Saudi and Russian, er, friends, except possibly "Oh-dear-what-a-pity-never-mind!'?  And by the way, memo to 'St. Theresa of May' - must remember to be awfully nice to that 'good ol' boy' in the White House even if he grabs you by the, er, you know what!

 

The Sunday Rumble: 5.3.17

Bumps in the Brexit road:   Nothing produced more sniggers from me than the prat-falls executed by the heavenly chorus of doom-laden hysterics who foretold the end of the world as we know it if we voted for Brexit.  We ignored them, or most of us did, and guess what - the end of the world was postponed!  Even so, it would be an equal folly to assume that divorce from the EU will not entail some collateral damage.  However, as we stumble-bum our way to freedom, let us not forget the increasing adversities that would have been inflicted on us had we stayed in.  In fact, such is the parlous state of the divided EU today that it is not beyond possibility that by the time we reach the end of our 'negotiations' there may not be an EU for us to leave!

 

Mind you . . .   To be fair, given the fact that the 'Shinners' and the 'Proddies' are about to kick off on round 193 of their never-ending punch-up, and that the 'Jock Nats' are eagerly looking for an Anglo - any old Anglo will do - to head butt, one cannot be absolutely certain that there will be a United Kingdom left to walk out of the EU!

 

I thought the Jews were smarter than that!   I was surprised - well, mostly because I had never thought about it before - to learn that the state education system in Israel, and particularly in East Jerusalem, was strictly divided on ethnic and religious grounds.  Needless to say, the Arab controlled schools concentrate their efforts on producing as many Islamic militants as they can, for example, the recent wave of knife attacks was traced back to such schools.  Far be it from me, a goy, to advise the Israelis but surely there must be a better system. Gidon BenZvi at The American Thinker has some suggestions.

 

Profile in courage? I don't think so!   There is a delicious example of American humbuggery to be found in the granting of the 'Profile in Courage Award' to President Obama.  Older readers will recall that this pompous award was based on the book Profiles in Courage written(?) by the late Jack Kennedy.  Like almost everything in the history of the mostly despicable Kennedy clan, this was a false claim because it became clear much later that it was his speech writer, Ted Sorenson, who wrote most of it - why am I not surprised?  Thus, it is deliciously appropriate that 'Ol Big Ears' is up for this fake prize given the fact that it was his friend and neighbour, the ex-terrorist, Bill Ayers, who wrote most of the book Dreams from My Father.  Read all the sordid details at The American Spectator.

 

 

Trump digs a grave:   The only question is whether he buries Obama in it or himself!  He has openly accused Obama of criminal behaviour without, so far, offering any proof.  That Obama was, and still is, capable of bending, or even breaking, the law is not something that would have me calling for the smelling salts.  Even so, such an accusation should, and must, be backed up by evidence.  So far Trump has not produced any although he has asked Congress to investigate the matter.  Whether they will must be doubtful given the lack of any substantial evidence - so far!  'The Donald' likes to live dangerously, let us hope he doesn't die of it, er, politically speaking, that is!

 

 

No more rumbles

 

 

"To err is human; to forgive, divine"

Thus sayeth the late Alexander Pope and as he was something of a deep thinker and I am not, I will not argue the point.  The phrase came to mind after I read a report on the recent military trial of a young Israeli soldier who shot dead an already wounded Palestinian terrorist who had been subdued fifteen minutes earlier.  The military court convicted the soldier of "voluntary manslaughter" and sentenced him to 18 months in prison, although the prosecution asked for 3-5 years.  The soldier's defence was that he thought the prisoner still posed a threat because a knife he had used was nearby and also he thought the prisoner might have a bomb-belt.

Needless to say, the result has caused a furore and divided the Israeli nation.  It rather reminded me of the case 'over here' involving a Marine NCO who 'offed' a wounded Afghanistan fighter after he had been taken prisoner and who was convicted and imprisoned and is now fighting to have his sentence reduced.

What can you say about such cases?  Not much, unless you were there and had detailed knowledge of the background and the particular incident.  So I will not say much except that, in general, executing PoWs is wrong and anyone who does it should be forced to face the consequences in a court of law.

 

'Yerdy-durby-burbles' stink of humbug

This blog prides itself on maintaining the very highest standards in 'elf 'n' safety' so I strongly advice you all to wear a face-mask to protect yourselves from the stench of Swedish humbug (than which, etc, etc) and also to have a sick-bag handy as you read on.  But first of all, a picture:

 

 

There you have it!  Perhaps the greatest collection of Leftie-Feminist humbugs the world has ever seen.  These stern-faced ladies are all 'Yerdie-durbles', aka: Swedes - oh alright then, turnips as well!  More than that they are the new feminist government of Sweden and they are all highly principled feminists determined, now that they hold considerable power in the Swedish government, to not only uphold feminist policies at home but also to demonstrate them around the world, starting with, er, Iran, actually!  So how did that go then?

Well, here they are slithering ooops, sorry, walking past President Rouhani, all of them carefully covering their hair, wearing trousers and overcoats.

Gosh, what a blow (no, no, not that sort - behave!) that was for feminine freedom!  Unfortunately, it did not go down too well with a truly brave woman, Ms. Masih Alinejad, the leader of a women's rights group:

Iranian women's right activist Masih Alinejad who urged Europeans female politicians "to stand for their own dignity" and to refuse to kowtow to the compulsory Hijab while visiting Iran.

Alinrejad created a Facebook page for Iranian women to resist the law and show their hair as an act of resistance, which now numbers 1 million followers.

"European female politicians are hypocrites," says Alinejad. "They stand with French Muslim women and condemn the burkini ban—because they think compulsion is bad—but when it happens to Iran, they just care about money."

Well, what with them being women and being Swedish it can only be a matter of time before they are given the Nobel Peace Prize.  Now, remind me, who was a recent recipient of that prize, and wasn't he a bit of a girlie?

H/tip t0:

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/02/shameful-hypocrisy-swedens-first-feminist-government

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/02/feminist_swedish_

government_wears_hijab_while_in_iran.html

 

Give the job to Sally Bercow

If we must, I mean, really, really must, have a Bercow in the headlines could we not bring back Sally into the limelight.  She is infinitely better-looking and does it all so much better than that utter twit of a husband of hers and in doing so she usually manages to flash a bit of inner thigh which is quite exciting for old geezers like me! 

 

Frankly, Bercow himself has passed from being a national joke to being an embarrassing national prat of the first order.  His outburst yesterday on the subject of President Trump's forthcoming visit was infantile.  I can't help wondering whether his bad-temper stemmed originally from some recent but yet-to-be-reported naughtiness by his wife, or whether he was worried about what might transpire should Sally meet Donald?

 

 

Whatever, it is long past time that parliament should rid itself of this pompous, insufferable poltroon and choose a new Speaker of the House.  Brendan O'Neill at The Coffee House spells out the rank hypocrisy of the man who complains about Trump's 'racism' and 'anti-feminism'.

Bercow, you see, this supposed hero of the refugees and Middle Eastern migrants temporarily banned from the US, voted for the bombing of Iraq. He green-lighted that horror that did so much to propel the Middle East into the pit of sorrow and savagery it currently finds itself. As his profile on the They Work For You website puts it, ‘John Bercow consistently voted for the Iraq War’. On 18 March 2003, he voted against a motion saying the case for war hadn’t been made, even though it hadn’t. On the same day he voted for the government to ‘use all means necessary’ to ensure the destruction of Iraq’s WMD.

[...]

Bercow was one of the authors of this calamity, one of the signatories to the Middle East’s death warrant, and now we’re going to let him posture and preen against Trump’s three-month ban on certain Middle Eastern migrants?

Is there a factory somewhere that takes in noxious waste, re-processes it and then churns out MPs like Bercow?  If so, we should bomb it!

 

 

The Sunday Rumble: 29.1.17

Er, not very subtle, Donald:   Although I do realise that you don't really do subtle!  Even so, I agree that Islamic immigration is a potential problem but using a sledgehammer to crack a nut is not perhaps the best solution.  I do hope you will tread a little more carefully when it comes to finance and trade matters., to say nothing of war and peace!

 

'California, off we go':   According to Zero Hedge, the State of California is moving inexorably towards secession.  Whilst Donald threatens to withdraw Federal funds from so-called sanctuary cities, such as LA and San Francisco, the State government is planning to make equal cuts in the money they send to the Federal government!  "There may be troubles ahead ..."

 

You want hash? We got hash!   According to Peter Hitchens at The Mail, if you are in need of a shot of decent hash, then 'you do need to get your arse down 'ere to Zummerzet'!  Apparently the Avon & Somerset Constabulary long ago gave up on the cannabis trade and now they have more or less surrendered on hard drugs, too.  Should you be caught in possession, the local Plods will offer you a three and half hour 'workshop' which, if you accept, means that you will not be charged. "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime!"  Jolly good show, move along, nothing to see here!

 

A smile from The American Thinker:   Not all that funny, I agree, but it's worth it just for a look at Melania's svelte figure!

 Also, rather appropriate given that she is suing The Daily Mail!

 

Let the pipes skirl for the death of Tam Dalyell:   He was a Scottish gentleman of the 'auld school' and a one-man awkward squad who throughout his long parliamentary life was never afraid to come to his own conclusions and then pursue them to the end.  Famously, he went after 'that woman' over the sinking of the Argentinian battleship, Belgrano, during the Falklands war which he designated a war crime, not that her defences were even dented!  Iain Martin over at REACTION has an even-handed summary of his life which is worth reading, including this tale:

Attempting to change the subject and take an advantage, Smith [then leader of the Labour party] asked suddenly why Dalyell had failed the test to become an officer during his National Service. He had been to Eton and was a Baronet. The army usually made allowances for these matters, surely? Smith said he had always wondered what had gone wrong. Tam had served only as a private. Why? There was a long pause. “John, it was something to do with me losing a tank on Salisbury Plain.”

 

Now this is interesting:   Courtesy of Zero Hedge here is a diagram showing the main countries sending and receiving immigrants.

The basic source was the United Nations so whether those charts are 'lies, damned lies or statistics', I do not know. 

 

Shakespeare and the death of Lincoln:   This comes under the heading of 'Whodathunkit' but only because I am an ignorant Limey with very little knowledge of Lincoln, partly because none of you 'Yankee-doodles' ever answer my plea for a Lincoln biography which is detached and not hagiography!  Anyway, I have just discovered that John Wilkes Booth, Lincoln's assassin, was (along with his two brothers) a distinguished Shakespearean actor of his day.  He had gained much approbation for his performance as Antony in Julius Caesar.  I learned this from a long essay in National Affairs on the subject of American love for Shakespeare which manifested itself last year during the celebrations of his death 400 years ago.  Also, I learned that Chicago - yes, Chicago! - was the national leader:

Chicago rather than London or Stratford-upon-Avon has been the Shakespearean cosmopolis this year. The Shakespeare 400 Chicago commemoration has featured 850 events at 120 locations for an audience of 500,000 people.

I will never be rude about Chicago ever again!

 

No more rumbles today

 

 

Nothing so il-became his Presidency as his leaving of it

You were right, I was wrong!  Even 8 years ago as he was about to take over as POTUS, I tried to be kind to Barack Obama.  I assured you, my readers, that he would not turn out as bad as you might fear but fortunately you were shrewd enough to mutter something like "Duffers has lost the plot - and his mind -  and I only read him for his Monday jokes!" or something like that.  And just to rub it in, at the very end of his Presidency, the 'big girl's blouse' has thrown a hissy fit and behaved not just abominably but dangerously and stupidly.  I always thought he was a bit of 'girlie', I remember remarking on his limp-wristed descent of aircraft steps which was always a dead give-away of his feminine side.

But now the bitch in him as come to the fore with his frantic and criminally stupid actions prior to the Trump take-over.  Tossing hand-grenades into the critical Middle East situation was pointless, dangerous and utterly irresponsible.  His crafty support for Planned Parenthood, the baby killers for profit, was disgusting and immoral and merely an excuse to let loose his corrupt (non)Justice Department on Christian organisations who oppose abortion.  Then, in one totally irresponsible hissy-fit, he tried his very best to ratchet up a confrontation between his own country (repeat: his own country!) and one of the most powerful nuclear powers in the world.

Trump should consider banging him and that 'Oirish thickoe', Kerry, into Guantanamo for the next 20 years!

STOP PRESS:  Now The Washington Times is reporting that Obama might try and squeeze his favourite judge onto the Supreme Court in the very few minutes between the end of one Congressional session and the beginning of the next.  It would be an extremely dodgy move and might well fail but would that stop an insane egotist like him?

 

 

I'm beginning to worry about that woman - no, not that one, the other one!

There was never much to worry about with the original 'that woman' but I am becoming increasingly uneasy over her current successor.  As I mentioned before, Mrs. May was a 'do nothing, say nothing' Home Secretary which, given her most famous speech in which she described her own party as "the nasty party", was perhaps "A Good Thing!"

Today she is reported to have laid into the American government in general, and the ineffable John Kerry in particular, for its sudden volte face towards Israel.  However, she has maintained the feeble stance of her own government by supporting the malignant proposition before the Security Council.  Presumably she thought she could hide behind the American veto but when it was suddenly withdrawn by the childish Obama she was left exposed and looking like the prize humbug she apparently is.

The Telegraph reports:

“We do not… believe that the way to negotiate peace is by focusing on only one issue, in this case the construction of settlements, when clearly the conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is so deeply complex,” Mrs May’s spokesman said.

“And we do not believe that it is appropriate to attack the composition of the democratically elected government of an ally. The Government believes that negotiations will only succeed when they are conducted between the two parties, supported by the international community.”

Well, Prime Minister, if you really believe that "focusing on one issue" is wrong, why did you vote for it?  Also, we would dearly like to know what you will do when every vicious little anti-Semite and Islamist extremist in Britain begin their campaign of arraigning travelling Israelis who pass through London on the grounds that they are guilty of breaking international law as laid down by the United Nations?

 

President 'Elizabeth Violet Bott' enjoys a temper tantrum on the way out

I know, I know, another incomprehensible title especially to my American readers who, poor things, never had the opportunity to read the greatest children's book ever written - Just William by Richmal Crompton.  The 'hero', William, 11, leads a gang of 'very naughty boys' called 'the Outlaws' who create mischief and mayhem even when they are trying to do good!  Unfortunately, they are plagued by the constant presence of Violet Elizabeth Bott, the very spoiled daughter of the local millionaire.  She constantly thwarts their plans because if they do not fit in with her 'agenda' she instantly threatens, "I'll thcream and thcream 'till I'm thick!"

And that brings me to the 'big girl's blouse' who currently occupies the White House!  Furious that his chance of graciously laying the coronet on the head of a duly grateful Hillary Clinton, and determined to do down Trump in any way possible, as well as poking those jumped-up Jews in the eye with a sharp stick, he has indulged in the sort of hissy-fit of which Violet Elizabeth Bott would have been proud.  At a stroke, he has up-ended 50 years of American foreign policy by abstaining on a vote at the UN Security Council which would have stymied yet another attempt by radical Islam to get their fingers round the throat of the Israeli government; a government, I would remind you, that not withstanding their occasional errors of judgment, is the sole representative of democracy in the Middle East.

Thus, this petulant President has laid the groundworks for another fifty years of strife in the so-called 'Holy Land' but, of course, as the bombs go off and the rockets fly into built-up areas, he will remain undisturbed on his favourite Hawaiian golf courses where, in fact, he spent most of his useless presidency!

 

 

The Sunday Rumble: 18.12.16

That creepy coincidence thing all over again:   Lying in bed this morning I heard on the news that some distinguished quack called Heimlich had died.  Apparently he had invented something which subsequently was named after him as 'the Heimlich manoeuvre'.  Still being half asleep I assumed it was some sort of devilish clever tank manoeuvre invented by a German general in WWII!  Later, as I woke up properly I realised that Heimlich was actually a doctor and the 'manoeuvre' referred to was a means by which people choking to death could be saved.  Anyway, an hour later, sitting here before my computer composing the breathless prose that delights you all - and I heard that! - I took a swig of tea which instantly went down the wrong hole.  Cue: Duff flailing around desperately, crashing into the furniture whilst attempting to get some air into my lungs without drowning in tea.  Damn, how I wished I knew that Heimlich manoeuvre!

 

A bit of seasonal Shakespeare:   I was reminded of this yesterday and also it reminded me that I used to print the occasional poem on this blog for your delight and edification - sorry, did you say something? Anyway, as this one is sort of seasonal being wintery and keeps referring to "green holly" I thought it appropriate.  Also, as it contains some bitter recriminations concerning human nature it will appeal to all you Christmas grumps who can't wait for the season of goodwill to be over!

Blow, blow, thou winter wind,

   Thou art not so unkind

      As man’s ingratitude;

   Thy tooth is not so keen,

Because thou art not seen,

      Although thy breath be rude.

Heigh-ho! sing, heigh-ho! unto the green holly:

Most friendship is feigning, most loving mere folly:

   Then, heigh-ho, the holly!

      This life is most jolly.

 

   Freeze, freeze, thou bitter sky,

   That dost not bite so nigh

      As benefits forgot:

   Though thou the waters warp,

      Thy sting is not so sharp

      As friend remembered not.

Heigh-ho! sing, heigh-ho! unto the green holly...

 

 

   The Trump tsunami:   They should have cancelled Christmas in the Chanceries of the world and kept all those policy wonks at their desks trying to figure out how the world will change under President Trump.  I still don't think there is a full - or even slight - realisation of the way the world will move for all of us.  Ted Belman at The American Thinker provides a few clues and if even half of them come to pass then it will be exceedingly gulp-inducive!  NATO could virtually disappear because it costs the USA a fortune and it is virtually useless for combatting terrorism which Trump sees as the main threat.  Chinese arrogance is likely to suffer some bruises, in fact, it has already begun with Trump's telephone chat with the Taiwanese president.  'Vlad the Impaler' could become Donald's (and thus America's) NBF - New Best Friend.  The Palestinians need to get real because Trump is hacked off with the whole Israeli/Palestinian imbroglio and he believes, apparently, that the formerly soft, neutral line followed by Obama merely encouraged Palestinian intransigence.  Amongst the first things he might do is recognise Jerusalem as the capital of Israel by moving the American embassy there.  There is more, according to Mr. Belman so read his article and then start digging in! 

 

 

GDDS - the latest affliction on Mankind:   Er, well, to be exact, not

exactly the whole of Mankind just the dimwits who support the Democrat

party because this serious affliction is Galloping Democrat Dysfunctional

Syndrome in which the sufferers (who sniggered?) thrash around

helplessly blaming everyone and their uncles for Hillary's defeat.

Apparently, 'it woz the Russians wot dunnit', or if not them, then that 'dirty

rat' who runs the FBI, or, of course, it was the 'meedja', er, even if roughly

90% of them were Dem sympathisers.  Anyway, someone is to blame and,

of course, the fact that the Dem dimwits picked the most dislikeable

candidate they could find, a stupid, corrupt woman whose ego was only

eclipsed by her sense of entitlement had no effect on the outcome!

 

 

Shakespearean dribble:   According to the TLS, some cove has

written a book entitled Shakespeare and Economic Theory - yeeeeeees,

quite!  Well, it's obvious even from a slight knowledge of the scribbler's life

that money loomed large even from his childhood when dear old Dad was

wont to skim by bankruptcy with barely a shilling to spare.  But "economic

theory"?  Can't say I have ever come across that in the plays I have

studied.  Apparently, the author is much taken with Karl Marx - why am I

not surprised? - who was a great fan of 'our Will' thus proving that you can

fill a man with wisdom and he will still remain a fool!

 

 

Fancy a really good headache?   Oh, go on, give it a try!  Just click on

to an article written by Anthony Sudbery, a terrific maths/physics swot

who in no time at all will whisk you off to a land filled with cats which are

both dead and alive at the same time - such fun!  Yes, it's that dreaded

quantum theory lark again but somehow, even though I barely understand

it, it still has the power to fascinate.

 

 

'Brahms and Liszt?'  Not half!   For the benefit of my foreign

readers, the first half of my sub-title is taken from Cockney rhyming slang

- Brahms and Liszt = pissed!  See, you always learn something new here a

D&N, and yes, I'll have a large one, thank you for offering!  Perhaps the

main lesson to be learned from Damian Thompson's fascinating article in

The Spectator is not so much "Don't put your daughter on the stage, Mrs.

Worthington" as don't ever allow your daughter to marry a musician.  And

I don't just mean those hairy rock 'n' rollers, I mean those composers of

frightfully posh classical music.  The cockneys (or more likely some

knowledgeable music swot) had it dead right with Brahms and Liszt, both

of whom were Olympic-standard boozers.  So too were Handel, Mozart,

Beethoven, Schubert, Schumann, Liszt, Brahms, Mussorgsky, Tchaikovsky

and Sibelius.  Not that all classical composers were boozers, Berlioz and

Wagner preferred opium!

 

 

No more rumbles today

 

 

  But don't miss tomorrow's Funnies - there are some corkers!

 

 

 

 

Dangerous vapid-minded dimwits

Alas, a GRADE I GRUMP WARNING needs to be issued before I continue with this particular post and you should take note of it before reading further!  In an idle moment I switched on to the Parliamentary channel and watched an emergency debate on what Britain should do about Syria in general and Aleppo in particular.  I should have thought the answer was blindingly obvious - nothing!  But of course, the bleeding hearts on Labour's benches were pumping their red goo all over the place.  'Something must be done', they thundered, one after another, without actually spelling out what - exactly!  Several Tories seemed to agree with them and Boris's head was nodding so vigorously I thought it might fall off.

However, during the fairly short time I watched this farrago before my nausea overcame me, I kept hoping that one of these latter-day Clausewitz's would actually sketch out a plan and some detail of how the plan would be executed.  Do any of them realise that our army is now the smallest it has been since before Napoleon's days?  And that our Air Force is so tiddly that I believe we can only take part in about one operation a month in the Middle East.  As for our fleet, well, we just kissed goodbye to our last carrier and the rest of our miniscule navy would have a job holding a regatta in St. Jame's Park lake!

Also, one wonders, where will all those Parliamentary bleeding hearts be when the really bleeding bodies return in stretchers or worse still in body-bags?  How brave they are standing tall in the Commons calling for 'action this day', but how brave will they be when their constituents berate them for the slaughter of their loved ones in pursuit of a totally useless gesture.  And exactly how much fortitude will all those Labour MPs have when the their beloved NHS and old age pensions and social services are reduced to minimalist levels in order to pay for war?

Someone please pass me a sick-bag!

 

And if the 'Arkies' don't getcha then the Wahhabis might!

I have no hesitation in branding Mr. James Mullin as "a very naughty boy".  He has, without hesitation, given the time bomb lurking beneath the Clinton Family a sharp kick!  Actually, it is a topic to which I alluded a day or two back.  In The American Thinker, Mr. Mullin reminds us that the Clintons were in receipt of some seriously heavy 'dosh' from sundry foreign sources who obviously swallowed whole the much touted belief that Hillary was absolutely and definitely headed for the White House.  Amongst them was the, er, 'much respected and entirely proper' Wahhabi Oil Company who slipped the Clinton Foundation $20 million, entirely for charitable purposes, of course, and absolutely nothing to do with Clinton policies aimed at destroying American coal mines and oil pipelines, to say nothing of the startling shale gas discoveries in Texas.

As Mr. Mullin puts it:

If e.g. you are the Wahhabi Oil Company and you’ve donated 20 million dollars to try to keep a lid on American coal or natural gas production, only to find that your player can no longer throw the game, do you just chalk that up to fate, the vagaries of politics, the will of Allah?

I don't think so, and also, I don't see your average Saudi Arabian zillionaire having much in the way of a sense of humour, except when watching people having their heads chopped off.  It's possible that quite soon the Clintons might find a camel's head in their bed!  On the other hand, returning the money presents an exquisitely delicate problem.  The new Attorney General might decide to encourage his officials to take a close look at the accounts of the Clinton Foundation and $20 mill in, followed by $20 mill out, would be hard to explain.

In the meantime, I do urge Hillary and Bill - and Chelsea - to up their security!

 

And lo, God has oiled the Trumpian wheels of fortune

Honestly, I have absolutely no idea whether President Trump will be, in the words of Sellar & Yeatman, "A Good Thing" or "A Bad Thing" but already it is clear that he is definitely 'A Lucky Thing'.  First of all he was lucky enough to have as an opponent one of the most deeply unpleasant women in American politics.  If she had possessed an iota of charm or decency about her, I doubt that 'The Donald' would have won.

But now, I gather from Mr. Thomas Lifson at The American Spectator, that Christmas has come early for 'The Donald'.  Yesterday, the US Geological Survey issued their formal assessment of an oil/gas field in Texas:

A vast field of shale rock in West Texas could yield 20 billion barrels of oil, making it the largest source of shale oil the U.S. Geological Survey has ever assessed, agency officials said.

The Wolfcamp Shale geologic formation in the Midland area also contains an estimated 16 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 1.6 billion barrels of natural gas liquids, the agency said in a release.

The discovery is nearly three times larger than the shale oil found in 2013 in the Bakken and Three Forks formations in the Dakotas and Montana, said Chris Schenk, a Denver-based research geologist for the agency.

In the interests of accuracy I should stress that this is not a new discovery but it is an expert assessment of its potential by oil/gas experts. It is also interesting to note that other oil/gas experts believe that there are even more such fields yet to be assessed.  Truly, Texas is the State that keeps on giving!

Meanwhile, back in downtown Riyadh, the brown stuff (and I don't mean oil!) is hitting the fan.  The House of Saud depends utterly and completely on oil exports.  They have no further income streams for the simple reason that they have no further industries, they even have to import their food.  So if dear old grandpa pops his clogs and leaves you a nice house in central London, don't be too quick to sell it.  It will not be long before all those Arabian 'princes', and there are plenty of them, will be 'doing a runner' towards safe havens like London.

And to add that extra dollop of delicious cream to this tasty morsel of news, the Russians will be mightily pissed off, too!  Oil/gas is one of their principal exports as well, so if they actually conquer Syria all they will own is a zillion acres of sand!

 

 

Peter Oborne pricks our bubble of self-esteem

I meant to write about this a few days back when I received my latest copy of The Spectator, for whom Peter Oborne seems now to be a regular contributor - so that's another reason to take out a subscription!  Anyway, in that edition, in effect, he posed the question - Aleppo or Mosul: what's the bloody difference? and I would stress the word 'bloody'!  Constantly, or at least, when there is some 'good' TV footage showing wrecked buildings and weeping mothers and children, we are bombarded with coverage of what those dastardly Russians are doing on behalf of their cruel glove-puppet, Bashar al-Assad, as they proceed, mile by mile, to reduce the city of Aleppo to the sort of condition we achieved in Hamburg and Tokyo in 1945!  Cue: horror and outrage aimed mainly at 'Vlad the Impaler' and his despicable nation, Russia.

What we don't see or hear quite so much 0f is the campaign to reduce the Iraqi city of Mosul, the last bastion of those detestable IS fanatics.  This may be because it is our brave RAF chaps who are assisting in the, er, 're-planning' of that unfortunate city as the campaign to wrest it from IS control proceeds inch by bloody inch.  Oborne summarises the predicament thus;

When opponents of the West try to reclaim urban areas from terrorists, they are denounced. When our allies do the same — think of Israel in Gaza or the Saudis in Yemen — we defend them. We judge Assad by one set of rules, and ourselves and our own allies by another.

Well, that's real-politik in action and the stench of humbug, and dead bodies, is overwhelming.  Like Oborne, I have no solution to the problem, it's 'the way of the world'.  Even so, I would appreciate a little less cant from our media and our politicians.  Also, it enforces my deep belief that we should remain as detached as possible from Middle East affairs until it becomes clear beyond doubt that our national interests are threatened.

In the meantime, read Oborne's article - oh, and take out a subscription to 'The Speccie'!

 

Time to review the legacy of 'Ol' Big Ears': #2

I posted on the subject of Obama's domestic legacy yesterday and today I turn, with even more uncertainty, to his foreign policy.  I stress the uncertainty because I have read enough history books to know that the complexity of foreign affairs is of such magnitude as to frequently fool the active participants themselves, let alone passing commentators like myself.  Even so, certain specific acts of foreign policy have been made by Obama and with the preceding caveat in mind I think we are free to comment.

First, there is his policy 'south of the border' in which the main move has been to bring to an end the deep freeze in American-Cuba relations.  I am happy to be contradicted by those with greater knowledge (plenty of them!) but it seems to me to have been a sensible move.  The Castro crime family is reaching its end and even were it to continue in some other guise I can see no advantage in the continuation of a 'cold war' that serves no useful purpose.  If the President was to freeze relations with every cruel and crooked tyrant in the world then the State Department could be cut by 90% - yes, I know, not entirely a bad thing!  The sad fact is that Cuba, like Venezuela and others will continue on the path of Marxist socialism which, of course, is merely a cloak for power-mad regimes to keep control, but in the end their people will erupt.  By maintaining 'friendly' relations, at least the people will not blame the Americans for their plight.

Next, God help me, I move to the Middle East.  The entire region is a fester-pot of incredible complexity in which it is impossible to pick sides, or at least winning sides.  At least, and very sensibly, Obama has kept American boots off the ground and has mainly confined himself to using stand-off air power mainly against IS which, in contrast to other factions is a clear and obvious menace to the West.  In addition he has aided other factions to fight IS but probably he realises that in the end there can be no certainty as to who comes out on top and what their nature will be.  In about a hundred years the books will come out to explain it all but in the meantime I think he is right to keep America at a distance.

Finally, on to the real menace in world affairs - China!  There is no doubt that sooner or later China will move to demonstrate its very real power.  Probably they will begin by enforcing their claim on jurisdiction over the South China Sea.  This absolutely and definitely has to be resisted even to the point of war - in my opinion speaking as an ex-Corporal!  This will be a problem not for Obama but for his successor.  Unfortunately, he or she(!) will already be on a back-foot because the Philippines under the leadership of another mouth-dribbling thug has decided to take a violently anti-American stance.  No doubt Chinese gold played its part in that particular volte-face and we can expect similar 'persuasion' to be applied to other nations in the region.  It may well be that the next American President will have to resort to economic 'warfare' against China before they send in the carriers.  Chine's economy is brittle to say the least and it will be a tempting target.

So, all in all, I think Obama's 'do little' policy has been about right and definitely preferable to some previous Presidents.  What follows, I cannot say, but I tremble, sir, I tremble!

 

 

'Travesties' by Tom Stoppard

I enjoyed a terrific Sunday!  I had booked tickets for SoD and I to go and see Travesties by Tom Stoppard at an incredible little place called The Menier Chocolate Factory Theatre in London. 

It was, apparently, once a real chocolate factory built by a French company in the 1870s and today much of the fabric of the building is preserved.  It is situated in Southwark Street so if, as we did, you arrive in London at Waterloo, you can just walk down to the Embankment by the London Eye and hop on one of the river cruise boats which ply their trade up and down the Thames.  Yesterday was a perfect, sunny Autumn day and the boat took us down past the Royal National Theatre and the Tat Modern, oooops, sorry, that should be the Tate Modern, and dropped us off outside The Globe Theatre, the site of the late, great Sam Wanamaker's glorious reconstruction of Shakespeare's theatre.  A short walk down Southwark Street and there was the Chocolate Factory.

The 'auditorium', if that is quite the word, is more or less a large rectangle.  The stage takes up one corner of the rectangular space and the audience sit along two sides of it.  The seating is mostly simple padded-bench-style but surprisingly comfortable.  The fact that you are almost within touching distance of the actors makes it a very intimate space.  It is, without doubt, an exceedingly eccentric theatre and thus, Tom Stoppard's Travesties fitted in beautifully!

I have tried once or twice to describe this play to you because once upon a time I directed it but I am painfully aware that it might have left you with the impression that it is an incomprehensible shambles, a travesty, so to speak.  The story, or stories, are told by the very, very elderly Henry Carr whose memories of his time as Vice-Consul to the British embassy in Zurich in 1917 are, shall we say, confused!  Even so, it is an historical fact - the sort of unconsidered trifle that only a man like Stoppard would pause to consider - that in 1917 Henry Carr sued James Joyce for the cost of a pair of trousers which Carr had used in an amateur production of The Importance of Being Earnest directed by the Irish novelist.  At the same time, in and around this theatrical dispute in 1917 Zurich, were Tristan Tzara, the inventor of Da-Da-ist poetry, and Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, aka: Lenin.

It is difficult to find the right word for Stoppard's play, perhaps 'a confection' is the closest to pinning it down although beneath the mad, helter-skelter froth of an incoherent storyline, there are some hard truths concerning the nature of art and politics.  I can't advise you to buy a script because most people find it quite difficult to read a play text of any kind.  This one is near impossible to read and make sense of unless you have been an actor or director.  Also, it requires a reasonably comprehensive knowledge of Tzara, Joyce and Lenin.  However, if you get even a sniff of a chance to see a production then DO NOT MISS IT!  The run at the Chocolate Factory is about to end but the word is that it will almost certainly move into the West End.  It will cost you more but you will never see anything like it again, particularly if most of the cast stay with it, especially Tom Hollander ('Corky' in The Night Manager).

Not to be missed, People!

(Incidentally, under the tutelage of SoD, who may know next to bugger all about Brexit but is an expert on travelling round London, I actually used a London bus for the first time in my life.  What an adventure!) 

 

 

The Sunday Rumble: 9.10.16

Warning:  We're entertaining neighbours this evening so I might be coerced co-opted into assisting with the preparations which might result in fewer 'rumbles' - and I heard that!

What, exactly and precisely, is Obama up to?   It appears that America and Russia are going toe to nuclear toe in Syria and since the fall out, in all senses of the phrase, is likely to be severe for everyone everywhere, it is not unreasonable to ask 'Ol' Big Ears' what he thinks he's up to?  Does anyone, outside of Syria, give a flying fig whether the mass killer, Assad, is or is not replaced by another mass killer?   All that Obama has achieved in Syria is to help suck the Russians in and because they have a very clear aim and are prepared to fight for it the chances of a nuclear confrontation are now higher than they were in the Cold War.  Well done, Mr. President and no doubt you can't wait to scuttle out of the White House and hand the whole stinking mess over to your successor - and I don't suppose you much care who it is, either!

 

An election or not an election:   With apologies to Will, that is the question!  Whether 'tis nobler in the mind for Mrs. May to fight on towards Brexit with only a small parliamentary majority and an increasingly vociferous opposition from within her own ranks, or, to take arms against a sea of troubles and go back to the country for a fresh mandate?  It must be tempting because Labour and the 'Kippers' are self-destructing and the 'il-lib-non-Dems' have virtually disappeared.  On the other hand there is a lesson to be learned from the 'Book of Dave', another prime minister who asked the People and the cheeky, ungrateful bastards gave him the 'wrong' answer!

 

Just a bunch of fat-knackers these days:   I am referring to modern British soldiers who, according to The Telegraph, are failing their fitness tests in increasing numbers. 

Shockin', shockin'!  In my day your average British 'Tom' had a hundred and one smart dodges to avoid ever being tested.  I, myself, was awarded a DSM (Distinguished Skiving Medal) for supreme ingenuity in avoiding such things and thus was never shown up as the skinny wimp I was - and still am!  Even worse, according to this story, the women are actually catching up with the men in fitness tests. 

 

Britain's own James Angleton:   And if you do not know who James Angleton was then you are either very young or very ignorant of CIA/MI6 matters which, of course, you should be unless you have the right clearance!

 

                James Angleton                                             Stephen de Mowbray

Angleton was a high-ranking officer in the CIA, or to be precise, the Counter-Intelligence Department of the CIA which was tasked with defending the organisation against Soviet infiltration.  Not surprisingly he quickly became obsessed with the notion of 'spies under the bed' which must have reached epic proportions when he discovered that his great buddy, Kim Philby from MI6, was in fact a Soviet agent.  Stephen de Mowbray was Angleton's equivalent in MI6 and he became convinced that there was a high level Soviet mole inside the British Security Service, MI5.  It's all great stuff, indeed, the stuff of many a tale by 'John le Carre' (aka: David Cornwall) the inventor of 'George Smiley' and himself ex-MI5 and MI6.  Anyway, le Mowbray has died and his obit is in The Telegraph and well worth reading, er, if spies and spy-catchers are your thing!

 

Is Amber Rudd MP a treacherous saboteur?   I have mentioned before that "I ha'e ma doots" about the lady who showed herself to be a loud-mouthed and aggressive supporter of the 'Remain' camp during the referendum.  For reasons beyond me, 'St. Theresa of May' chose her to be Home Secretary.  Now she has come out with a plan to make all companies list their foreign workers which has rightly offended many people as verging on a police state and thus put Brexit on the back foot.  Sack her - now!

 

No more rumbles today I have been consigned to domestic duties!

 

Never mind Hurricane Matthew, what about my 'phones?

I was ashamed of myself yesterday because I suffered not just one but two catastrophes and I was distraught, I tell you, distraught!  First of all my TV 'do-flicker-recording-thingie' stopped working - I know, I know, can you imagine?  True, I only record, on average, about one programme every two months and it is also true that I only actually watch one of them every six months but even so, it was unsettling not to have it working.

Then, an even greater disaster struck Chateau Duff - the bloody-bloody telephones went down!  Again, it is true that given my non-existent social life, nine out of any ten calls I ever receive are from charming and polite East Asians asking me if I am Mr. David Duff and then assuring me that they are not trying to sell me anything.  If that's the case, I respond, what shall we talk about?  I never quite catch the reply because I ring off!  Even so, it's not until these gadgets cease working that you suddenly realise just how essential they are to the fabric of your life.

Anyway, yesterday was fraught but then I turned on the 'telly' to the never-ending horror story that is the battle for Aleppo in Syria.  I will not describe it because I am certain you have all seen it over and over and over again.  Just as I was reaching for the OFF button the story changed to Hurricane Matthew which was in the process of flattening Haiti before moving on to do its worst to Florida.  That was when the shame hit me!  Here was I getting all uptight because my 'phones weren't working and there were people being blown to bits by bombs and blown away by storms.

I spoke to myself very severely and I can promise you that I will never whinge again!

 

The Sunday Rumble: 2.10.16

The Sunday Rumble due at platform one is slightly late today because of interference on the line!  First of all, as I indicated yesterday, my sad life has been suddenly enlivened by the prospect of the Tory party conference - I know, I know, it says so much about me! - and that will take some of my afternoon.  Secondly, in a moment of madness this morning, I actually bought a copy of the newspaper produced by my ex-best friend, 'Rupe'.  Decades ago, only the threat of an imminent WWIII would have stopped me from reading The Sunday Times (ST) but when 'Rupe', no doubt under pressure to pay for all those ex-wives he has accumulated, began charging me to read his internet copy I switched to 'Her Maj's Daily Torygraph' which was free.  Anyway, this morning, at severe risk of a double hernia, I staggered home with The Sunday Times which must have taken half a Brazilian rain-forest to produce and I am still ploughing through it.  Anyway, all of that is just to assure my regular readers, both of you, that some rumbles will appear during the course of the day.  Whether they will be worth waiting for I leave you to judge!

'Israel, O, Israel':  One of the first things I read in the ST was an article by Ari Shavit (no, me neither!) who was mourning the death of Shimon Peres.  At this moment I will not attempt to paraphrase his views, suffice to say that he believes that "Today it is manifestly clear that if a profound change does not occur soon, Israel's democratic and moral identity will be in grave danger."  Even with my sketchy knowledge of all matters pertaining to the Middle East, I have sensed that all is not well in Israel.  I will leave it to my Jewish friends to comment.

'Gal done good'!  I crawl at the kitten-shoed feet of 'St. Theresa' salivating over the elegant leopard spots!  Yes, I actually watched her entire speech at the party conference, the first time I have ever watched more than 7 micro-seconds of any politician, er, except when the bloody-bloody 'do-flicker-thingie' goes missing and I can't hit the 'off' switch.  She was commanding but more than that she spoke good common-sense and in this she was fully supported by David Davis who will actually conduct the process of us departing from the EU - and we absolutely and definitely will be departing!  "Free again; happy, happy me again"!

The 'ST' was, well, alright, I suppose:  It was good to see that a couple of my favourite writers (David Smith and Irwin Stelzer) were still scribbling.  I don't always agree with them but they're worth reading.  I hadn't realised that the inimitable Rod Liddle wrote for 'Rupe', I thought he was the preserve of us posh 'Speccie' readers.  Typically, he found the amusing side of the current kerfuffle over the Women's International Chess tournament which is to be held in Iran.  Some of the western ladies are refusing to attend because the mad mullahs are insisting that they must wear head scarves.  Naughty Mr. Liddle wondered whether the four bishops on each board would have to be decapitated, and the knights might be banned for their past misdeeds during the Crusades.

 

No more rumbles today

 

Gotta just lurve that 'Speccie'

It is becoming increasingly obvious that the writer of this blog - er, that's me! - is not an original thinker.  Well, after 11 years of pontificating, meandering and straightforward hacking it should be obvious!  Lest you doubt me here's another example, stolen without shame from this week's Spectator.  I never thought the 'Speccie' would ever replace the late, great Auberon Waugh but they managed it with the incomparable Rod Liddle, a man, like his predecessor, who approaches every topic from a unique angle.

This week, Mr. Liddle turned his sharp gaze upon the subject of the reptilian, Mr. Anjem Choudary.  For the benefit of my foreign readers, this ghastly, creepy man is a British-Asian, Islamic fanatic devoted to praising the works of ISIL and encouraging others of similar ilk to do their best to follow the instructions of that organisation.  I stress the fact that he encourages others because, of course, the snivelling coward would never dare to take action himself.

 

After several years of putting up with this obnoxious man, the authorities finally decided to 'feel his collar' and after a trial at the Old Bailey he has been sentenced to five and a half years, a sentence which most of the media think was decidedly too easy.

However, as the astute Rod Liddle points out, Choudary has not actually done anything!  As he puts it, in his inimitable style:

Mr Choudary and his pet halfwit have received their sentences largely, I think, for wishing the complete destruction of western civilisation. I too yearn for this from time to time, such as when I am forced to contemplate a semi-naked Keith Vaz instructing his Slavic rent boys to ‘Treat me like a bitch!’ or whenever I see or hear or smell Labour’s shadow Brexit minister, Emily Thornberry. Wishing for the destruction of an entire civilisation simply on account of these two porky weasels, or because Justin Welby has said something fatuous again, is of course a grotesque overreaction. But we all overreact from time to time. I remember my wife, whom I mentioned earlier, remark while watching an edition of Question Time featuring the comedian Eddie Izzard: ‘Christ help us, please let’s move to Russia.’ That was an overreaction, too.

Quite so!  I have lost track of the number of times during the dismal 'reign' of 'Dave 'n' George' when I have wished a sinkhole to appear in the English Channel and swallow up the entire country, men, women, and especially, the 'kiddie-winkies'!  Part of Choudary's 'crime' was to encourage like-minded Islamists to take themselves off to the Middle East and join the fight.  Like Mr. Liddle, I join that plea - the more of them that bugger off the better!

If Choudary’s injunction had been followed by the, what is it, ten or 15 per cent of British Muslims who approved of 9/11, Isis, the Taleban etc, it would have been the greatest contribution to internal British security since the Emperor Hadrian decided to do a spot of bricklaying. I’d have given Choudary a medal.

It was claimed that Choudary had encouraged Islamists in Britain to, in effect, practice a bit of head-chopping before they departed but according to Mr. Liddle there wasn't much in the way of evidence.  According to the 'Cocklecarrot' presiding over the court, Choudary had been insufficiently vocal in condemning the activities of militant Muslims.  Does that mean we all have to attend a public meeting once a week to denounce Islamic barbarism in order to prove what upright British chaps and chapettes we are?  I think not!

Anyway, buy yourself a copy of the world's oldest and 'bestest' weekly magazine - or better still, take out a subscription, or I might come round and chop your head off!

 

The Sunday Rumble: 21.8.16

The art - and craft! - of the eulogy:  I am provoked to this particular 'rumble' by an article I read via the ever-excellent Arts & Letters Daily.  It is a review of a book on the subject of eulogies which rather intrigued me because I have, on two or three occasions, been asked to deliver eulogies on dead friends.  Should you ever be invited to do it let me warn you that it's a damn ticklish business!  In the very nature of friendship you become aware of, shall we say, the highs and lows of a friend's character.  That's OK but it is the realisation that almost everyone at the ceremony is equally aware.  Too much gush and you will sound like a total hypocrite, too much honesty and the widow is likely to faint.  Minefield clearance is easier!

 

No, really, truly, honestly:   There is another interesting essay pointed to by A&LD on the subject of good, old-fashioned dishonesty in public discourse.  It suggests, among other things, that whilst we know that our leaders lie to us constantly we don't really care any more.  That can't be right, can it?

 

Another film for my Top Ten:   And yes, I know there are at least 38 films in my Top Ten but that merely goes to prove the breadth of my good taste!  Actually, this one is probably in there already but I happened to catch it again last night and I had forgotten how superb it is.  I refer to Master and Commander, directed by Peter Weir and starring Russell Crowe and Paul Bettany.  Nor should I forget the original writer, Patrick O'Brian, who invented two of the greatest characters in fiction.  Before you rush off to buy any of O'Brian's books let me warn you that they do contain a fair amount of sailing-ship jargon which is indecipherable to land-lubbers like me but if you develop the knack of skim-reading you can whizz past all that 'haul away the starboard fo'cstle main sail' stuff and just enjoy the yarns.  Or better still, just watch Peter Weir's superlative film.

 

They never stop:   I refer to the EU fanatics who run the closed-shop government of the European (dis)Union.  Apparently the Brussels bureaucrats are busy totting up the total medal-count of EU countries taking part in the Olympic games in order to prove that Europe is better than America.  Why can't they just concentrate on the important things, like their expense accounts?

 

'The evil that men do' just multiplies:   On hearing the news that yet another suicide bomber had wreaked havoc and horror, alas, I merely shrugged.  Then I heard that the 'perp' had deliberately targeted a wedding party and killed 50+ and wounded God knows how many.  Now what kind of twisted mind can actually choose a wedding party?  Surely, a happy, harmless occasion common to all people of all religions, everywhere.  Then I learned that the 'perp' was between 14 and 16 years of age.  Who, I wondered, could deliberately indoctrinate a kid of that age into doing their dirty work for them?  My mind wandered to that evil s.o.b. who got away with preaching hate to young Muslims here in Britain for over ten years before, finally, the law acted - even though he only received a sentence of 10 years and will thus probably be out in five.

 

"Oh, the horror, the horror!"   When it comes to matters of truly horrific, ghastly, car-crash ladies' fashion, I am forced to rely on my lovely - and elegant - e-pal, 'Sister Wolf', for guidance.  She deserves a Congressional Medal of Honour for courage above and beyond the call of duty in the way that she scours the depths of female fashion in order to warn the 'sisterhood'.  Here is a prime example:

  

It's the sort of thing you might find on a charity stall in support of the blind!  But actually, they cost - wait for it! - $795!

 

Well done, Sir Ian!   I have been a 'fan' of Sir Ian McKellen for some time now, not least because I was able to see him live in one or two of his Shakespeare productions and also his one-man show on the subject of Shakespeare and his plays.  However, with the exception of his film version of Richard III, I have not seen him on the screen and certainly not the film of Lord of the Rings in which he played, famously, the character of Gandalf.  I'm sure it was excellent and all that but it's just not my thing!  Even so, it speaks well of Sir Ian that, according to The Telegraph, he turned down $1.5 million to officiate at the wedding of some brain-dead American 'zillionaire' who wanted the 'ceremony' conducted in the style of Lord of the Rings with Sir Ian dressed as Gandalf.  I'm only a tad disappointed that Sir Ian never thought to pass the offer on to another distinguished 'thesp', er, me, actually!  I'd have done it for half the money - oh alright then, a quarter!

 

And here is my final - but loud - raspberry to the Olympics:   Apparently the 'lady' who won the female 800 metres has two internal testes and no womb or ovaries.  The 'ladies' who finished second and third have similar abnormalities.  I say bring back the tractor 'girls' of Sverdlovsk who used to win the hammer throwing competition back in the day!

 

No more rumbles today

 

Pity the poor Presidents

Before I begin today's sermon, oops, sorry, I mean 'post', let me tell you that today I am 'taking the waters' at Bath - and who said 'about time'?  I am driving an elderly lady neighbour over to a hospital for a knee operation and the 'Memsahib', always quick to seize any chance to cruise the elegant shops in Bath town centre was 'in like Flynn'!

Anyway, I would urge you all to take in an article by Andrew C. McCarthy in The National Review, a magazine that proudly puts the 'C' in conservative!  Unusually, in reviewing recent American strategy in the middle east, it takes a relatively soft line with Obama.

Inevitably, when there is a profound threat and an overarching strategic failure to apprehend it, disasters abound; and rather than becoming occasions for reassessment of the flawed bipartisan strategy, those disasters become grist for partisan attacks. From 2004 through 2008, the specious claim was that President Bush’s ouster of Saddam Hussein created terrorism in Iraq. Now it is that President Obama is the “founder of ISIS,” as Donald Trump put it this week.

Personally, I have tried not to be too critical of Obama's 'strategy' given that it complies with that propounded by that military genius, ex-Cpl. Duff, that by and large the Americans should keep 'boots off the ground' (except Special Forces) and use air and missile power to influence events.  Reading the details of the complexities of what is swirling and bubbling in the middle east makes it clear that we should keep our distance.  If the Russians are keen to be involved, we should hold the door open to them.  As those 'good ol' boys' in Texas, and elsewhere, have shown with their fracking abilities, oil, or at least, middle east oil, is no longer the strategic necessity it once was.

Whether or not the bellicose Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton understands that I do not know, it depends, I guess, who, having dumped zillions into the Clinton Foundation, has her ear!

 

The Sunday Rumble: 14.8.16

'Gotta lurve those Gershwin guys':   Last night's BBC Prom from the Albert Hall was devoted to the music of George and Ira Gershwin, than which, etc, etc!  It was performed by the John Wilson Orchestra, a new outfit to me, which consisted of a full mixture of symphonic and dance orchestras.  It was an enchanting evening only slightly spoiled by the gloomy knowledge that there will never be a greater collection of musical genius than that which accrued in 'Noo Yawk' in the '30s, '40s and early '50s of which the Gershwin brothers were only a part.

 

Just for you, SoD:   An interesting - well, interesting for Brexit nerds like me and SoD - in The Telegraph today, analysing how many of the doom 'n' gloom prognostications of the Euro fanatics have actually come to pass. Not that many, seems to be the summary.  Yes, there is the odd problem here and there, but then, when did we ever have no problems at all?  Also, not mentioned in the article, is the joyful fact that we have dodged the proposed new Euro Income Tax which is approaching the European horizon even as I write!

 

One of our Bishops is missing!   I confess that as it has become increasingly clear, except to a manic fringe of mouth-dribblers, that anthropological global warming is no real problem, I rarely visit those sensible sites, like 'Bishop Hill' because, well, what is there left to say?  Alas, the good 'Bishop' obviously feels the same because his site has more or less lapsed.  However, before it disappears entirely, I would like to express my thanks for his always scrupulous but deadly attacks on the loonies.

 

The best news I've seen in yonks:   There was some newsreel footage on 'telly' showing some Syrian people whose town had just been liberated from ISIS.  Some of the men were busy cutting off the beards they had been forced to grow and the women were running down the street cheering whilst some were busy burning their burqas.  it was a salutary reminder that not all Muslims are mouth-foaming, murderous loonies!

 

A simple question:   Would you have the nerve to dive into that Olympic cesspool swimming pool that keeps changing colour?  Riiiight, thought not!

 

But not all bad at the Olympics:   According to a report via Drudge, a Russian flag has been torn down and despoiled in the Olympic village.  I'm shocked, I tell you, shocked!  However, a 'Rooskie' official has said that it might have been a mistake by a cleaner!  Yeah, well, try telling  that to 'Vlad the Impaler' before he invades Brazil!

 

Not so much "'Allo, 'Allo" as goodbye, goodbye:  For the sake of my foreign readers, "'Allo, 'Allo" was an old BBC TV comedy(!) series set in occupied France during WWII.  I think I once watched about ten minutes of it and, well, talk about laugh, I nearly did!  Well, there's nothing that funny about the Gestapo, is there?  Anyway, the BBC in its infinite wisdom(not) has decided not to run a new series because some people might be upset by the appearance of Nazis!

 

No more rumbles today

 

 

The Sunday Rumble: 24.7.16

I do be a 'orny-'anded zon of the zoil:  Or at least, I will be later on when I set off with the 'Memsahib' and a couple of friends to undertake some fruit picking.  I'm not terribly good at it so most of my raspberries will probably be squidged and I will be in receipt of sundry bollackings from 'she who must be obeyed'.  I put up with it because I just love fruit crumble!

 

Brave fella' that Emmett Tyrrell:  He is the founder and editor of The American Spectator and he it was who forecast Trump's triumph at the Republican convention - eight days after he announced his run!  He has now doubled down on his bet by forecasting a Trump win in November.  According to him, republicans are divided over this and that but one single thing binds them together - their absolute determination to beat "crooked Hillary".  I think, over here, we sometimes underestimate the extreme detestation in which 'HillBilly' is held by an enormous number of Americans.

 

Jezza well and truly 'Hodged':   I still can't get used to Dan Hodges writing for The Mail on Sunday and so sometimes I miss his usually excellent columns.  His effort today is a corker.  It can be summed up in just one of his passages:

Jeremy Corbyn is not a nice or decent man. He is a coward. He is a hypocrite. He is a bully. And he is a fraud.

He continues by backing up those accusations with some recent history. 

 

Hate crime!  Really?   According to news reports this morning, the government has given the go ahead for so-called 'hate crimes' to be more severely punished and this will likely include saying publicly hateful things about other people.  Perhaps our new Home Secretary, the less than delicious Amber Rudd, will hand herself in for all the hateful things she said to Boris during one of those Brexit debates.

 

The Tour de France:   Is there anyone out there who really understands the ins and outs and the ups and downs of this ridiculous 'race' which takes weeks and weeks and which ends with everyone pedalling gently up the Champs-Élysées?  Still, I gather that it has been won by a frightfully decent British chap, so that's alright then!

 

That was a hard day's work:  We were driven by our friends to the fruit-picking site which has a fairly decent restaurant.  It was tough trying to choose a suitable red wine to wash down my lunch but I stuck to the task in hand and settled on an Argentinian Malbec.  After that the 'Memsahib' and our friends went off to pick fruit whilst I, valiantly, volunteered to sit in the sunshine and guard the ladies' handbags and finish off the red wine.  Damn, I'm good!

 

Turkey's in the oven:   I do not pretend to know what is really going on in Turkey.  I offer you an opinion piece from The Coffee House which intimates that the whole coup thing was a set up by Erdogan as a means for him to seize total power.  Read it and make up your own minds - but remember, that's how they do things in the Middle East!

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/07/president-erdogans-postmodern-coup/

 

John Kerry should sue the doorman at No. 10:   The other day, the Brain of America (aka: John Kerry) turned round suddenly and walked straight into the door of No. 10.  We all thought no damage had occurred, er, to Mr. Kerry (or to the door) but now I'm not so sure.  According to those rascals at IHTM, he has just issued the following statement:

“Secretary of State John Kerry said in Vienna on Friday that air conditioners and refrigerators are as big of a threat to life as the threat of terrorism posed by groups like the Islamic State.”

Yeeeeeeeeeeees, quite!

 

James Bond is a mystery:   I expect to be confused by John le Carré but not by James Bond.  However, I tried to watch the film Quantum of Solace tonight but gave up because I couldn't understand what the hell was going on or why!  I remember exactly the same confusion when I saw the film originally.  Is it the film-makers or is it, dread thought, me?  Don't answer that!

 

No more rumbles today

In which I forgive Matthew Parris his sins

Which particular sins of his do I have in mind?  Well, hardly any actually because I don't know the man, I only read his usually urbane, witty and intelligent columns in The Spectator every week.  Even so, a few weeks ago as the temperature was rising in the final run in to the referendum, he suddenly turned very nasty against the leading Brexiteers.  He sounded like the old queen that in one way he is but in another way he usually isn't!  Well, we're all entitled to our off days, for example, sometimes my sunny nature turns to near terminal grumpiness - yes, hard to believe, I know!

Anyway, today he is forgiven because he has put into words, sensible words, thoughts that have been flapping around in my mind since the infamous Chilcot Report was finally published.  Now, I am not a fan of Tony Blair but I do not think that his conduct of the Iraq war deserves ludicrous legal challenges.  As Parris puts it:

Doubtless Blair and everyone around him were incompetent. Doubtless they took on trust what they should have rigorously tested. Doubtless they shamelessly overegged the case to get support for what they believed to be necessary. Doubtless they never planned properly for the aftermath of the invasion, and doubtless the plans they did make were flawed. The whole fiasco was marked by blunder, delusion and miscalculation.

But, as Parris says, in effect, 'So what's new?'  That's what prime ministers and presidents do, have done and will continue to do.  Blair, and almost everyone around him, never contemplated the outcome that arose.  If fingers need to be pointed they should be wagged in the faces of all the military and intelligence 'experts', none of whom were prepared to resign.  In the meantime, let history be his judge - and executioner!

"Victory has a thousand fathers but defeat is an orphan."

Tomorrow the Chilcot brown stuff hits the fan

As I mentioned earlier, the fact that Tony Blair is very visibly 'back in town' indicates to me that he has no worries - and he has already seen the report!  Even so, somebody lied but equally, I suspect, the blame for the falsehoods will be spread evenly - and therefore, thinly - round Whitehall and Westminster.  Spanked 'pandies' all round but not too severe!  As for the dead and injured servicemen, well, as they say, 'shit happens' and anyone who volunteers for front-line service knows that and accepts the risks - and most of them wouldn't miss it for anything!  That's what soldiering is about.  Even so, I hope that accusatory fingers are pointed in the direction of the top Brass who do owe a duty of care to their own troops.  They above all should have been able to accurately assess the intelligence and yet none of them resigned and thereby risked their eventual ennoblements.

The Sunday Rumble: 17.4.16

Truth will out - eventually:   But when it comes to governmental 'truths' it is advisable not to hold your breath waiting!  Also, and this is another "Government Health Warning", don't assume that when various top-level enquiry reports are published they will contain "the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth".  So, it is with less than bated breath that I await the Chilcot enquiry report into exactly how many lies were perpetrated by HMG in order to gain public support for our disastrous foray into Iraq.  Similarly, I would urge my American friends not to become too excited at the possibility - I put it no higher - that the full report into the 9/11 attack detailing official Saudi aid and assistance to the attackers will be published any time soon.  After all, it's now 55 years since the Bay of Pigs fiasco and still the CIA refuses to publish its mea culpa - well, if it's not a mea culpa it bloody well should be!  George Will has an excellent article on the American non-reports over at The National Review.

 

Do the EU a favour and VOTE LEAVE:  Roger Bootle in The Telegraph today has an interesting take on the IN/OUT referendum.  He points out the truth that the EU, irrespective of whether we Brits are in or out, is heading for disaster because of the sclerotic but fanatical grip of the EU maniacs in Brussels.  The shock waves from a Brexit would simply provoke what is already looming.  The Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and the Netherlands are already edging towards the exit and the French nationalists are just waiting to boot Hollande in the derrière at next year's Presidential election.  So come on, people, we've saved Europe before, let's do it again!

 

Three cheers for The Mail:   At last, and entirely due to the good efforts of the readers of The Mail on Sunday, 'Dim Dave' and the patronising prats who support him will be forced in June to come to parliament and explain why, amongst other things, we continue to provide 'aid' to the likes of China and India, both nuclear powers, plus sundry thieves and killers who ravage their own countries in Africa.  If ever Dave deserved the soubriquet 'Dim' then his insistence that 0.7% of our budget, or £12 billion, is spent keeping dictators in place confirms it.

 

I lunched not wisely but too well:   Again!  Sorry about that but we had friends round for a late lunch and the wine flowed and time passed and afterwards I snoozed I had to try to work out the meaning of life and somehow I arose to seventh level of inner awareness.  Ah well, see you all tomorrow  . . . 

 

No more rumbles today

"For sufferance is the badge of all our tribe"

Signior Antonio, many a time and oft

In the Rialto you have rated me

About my moneys and my usances:

Still have I borne it with a patient shrug,

For sufferance is the badge of all our tribe.

You call me misbeliever, cut-throat dog,

And spit upon my Jewish gaberdine,

And all for use of that which is mine own.

The Merchant of Venice, I.iii

 

Thus spake the malevolent Jew, Shylock, in Shakespeare's least funny 'comedy'.  Well, I should know because I once played the clown character Launcelot Gobbo and I never got so much as a giggle for the entire run - and I heard that, darling!  It came to mind after I read an article by a man I admire immensely, Jonathan Sacks, the former Chief Rabbi of Britain.

He is rightly worried by the rising levels of anti-Semitism across Europe and particularly in this country.  Now before I go further let me confess that in my opinion, notwithstanding the holocaust and the preceding centuries of virulent anti-Semitism, I do not believe that Jews are somehow fault-free and unblemished by any wrong-doing.  The rights and wrongs of the Jewish 'incursion' back into Palestine, both the original concept and the handling of the current situation, are problems of such complexity as to be far beyond my understanding and indeed, I suspect, beyond anyone's!  We have what we have!

However, one thing is beyond argument, the politics of the State of Israel, a practicing democracy, cannot and should not be laid at the door of Jews in this country.  If the thuggish elements who have, weevil-like, bored their way into the Labour party, student unions and various community groups attempt to emulate their Nazi heroes they should be dealt with severely.  And I should add that my strictures apply equally to Islamic groups based in the UK.  Their spurious claims that their anti-Semitism is confined just to the State of Israel do not fool me!

Obama: Guru or Gump? Part III

My final words, you will be glad to hear, on the subject of  President Obama's foreign policy as defined by Jeffrey Goldberg at The Atlantic.  What struck me was the overwhelming concentration on Middle East affairs with only a brief mention of Sino-American tensions.  Of course, this might be more to do with Mr. Goldberg's priorities than the President's. Whatever, in my opinion China and its satrap, North Korea, are far and away the most crucial area in foreign affairs today - and tomorrow and for decades into the future.  It's impossible to deny that China is now a huge, and growing, world power.  Like all such powers throughout history, having built the muscles, it wishes to flex them and restraining them from doing so too enthusiastically is going to be the Devil's own job.

The first test is going to be in the South China Sea and I was glad to see that Obama, despite his shrewd mistrust of his military hierarchy, authorised USN ships to sail though waters claimed, entirely spuriously, by the Chinese as their territorial waters.  It was also good to read in Mr. Goldberg's article that the Obama administration was making great efforts to weave together as many of China's neighbours as it can to resist Chinese ambitions.  If ever there was a problem that is going to test the next POTUS to the extremes it is going to be relations with China.  It is going to take great intellectual ability and intelligence, some considerable courage and a lot of luck!  Given the two front-runners for next year's presidency all I can say is good luck with that one!

Of course, fascinating though Mr. Goldberg's article was, the fact is that we will only be able to offer a preliminary judgment on President Obama in about 25 years.  For a final assessment we will need to wait for the historians at the end of the century, to which I can only echo my old Jewish accountant, I should live so long, my life already!

ADDITIONAL:   No sooner had I written the waffle above than I turned to 'The Kraut' whose latest essay is at The Telegraph.  In it, he sums up the foreign policy attitudes of the four presidential front-runners.  Read it - and start digging your shelters now!

Obama: Guru or Gump? Part II

As already mentioned, Obama's apparently messianic belief in the 'dangers' of global warming is quite ludicrous and may, if pursued to the extremes internally, weaken America's economy far more than any supposed enemy.  That aside, it seems to me to have been eminently sensible for the USA to simply stand on the side-lines of the Middle East and to deploy the long-range sophisticated weaponry it possesses.  The fact is that America is simply no good at running other countries in the way that we did at the height of the British empire.  To be fair, I don't think we would have succeeded as well as we did in the 19th century if, in this era of global communications, we tried the same thing again.  Our pathetic attempts in Iraq and Afghanistan should be enough to convince anyone!  Goldberg's article in The Atlantic was entirely right in praising George W. Bush's effort in Kuwait when he patiently drew together an international force acting under UN aegis and drove the Iraqis out.  Sensibly (although I didn't agree at the time!), he did not follow the road all the way to Baghdad.  Alas, his son fell victim to the worst sort of hubristic Defence Department agitation and tried to do what dear old Dad had failed to do!  Well, we all know now how that turned out!

Obama has learned and his determination to stand aside militarily from the swamp of Middle East and inter-Islamic warfare is, in my view, eminently sensible.  That is not to say that there will not be unexpected repercussions but standing back from the fray leaves options open.  However, what can only be described as his courtship of Iran is a far more delicate operation.  Yes, he is right to distance himself from the abominable Saudi hierarchy, a government which treats half its population as slaves and executes anyone who demurs from its religious (actually, political!) fundamentalism.  It is necessary to remind ourselves that only a few decades ago Iran was a prosperous, modern, almost westernised, nation and I suspect that a considerable proportion of its population are as disgruntled with Islamic fundamentalism as we are.  The application of increasing amounts of American pressure is exactly what the mullahs want in order to tighten their grip on society.  Obama's 'courtship' is precisely what they do not want not least because it takes away 'the Great Satan' nonsense they rely on. 

I do not discount the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran but I rely on Israel to do our dirty work for us if the threat becomes real.  Some time ago I suggested that if the Iranian nuclear threat was as real as we all supposed, then we could rely on Israel to do the necessary.  So far they have not acted except, possibly, in assassinating the odd Iranian nuclear scientist or two!  However, if and when Iran becomes a real threat then I think we can depend on a ruthless realist like 'Bibi' to do the necessary.  Again, it needs to be stressed that nothing is certain in an exceedingly uncertain world but calm cool thinking will beat hot-headed belligerence every time.

Sorry, but another post on this subject will appear later.

Obama: Guru or Gump? (Part I)

"Friday, August 30, 2013, the day the feckless Barack Obama brought to a premature end America’s reign as the world’s sole indispensable superpower—or, alternatively, the day the sagacious Barack Obama peered into the Middle Eastern abyss and stepped back from the consuming void".  Thus spake, well, wrote, actually, Jeffrey Goldberg in his long, detailed and absolutely fascinating analysis of President Obama's foreign policy accumulated over several years of fairly close contact and interviews and published in The Atlantic magazine.

A year earlier, when the administration suspected that the Assad regime was contemplating the use of chemical weapons, Obama had declared: “We have been very clear to the Assad regime … that a red line for us [my emphasis] is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized. That would change my calculus. That would change my equation.”

A year later, Assad's chemical weapon attack on the people of the Damascus suburb of Ghouta murdered more than 1,400 civilians with sarin gas.  That was not so much 'a line in the sand' well and truly crossed but, in effect, Assad had kicked the sand in Obama's face!  Virtually the entire administration, led by that prize dummkopf, John Kerry, were insistent that, in effect, 'something must be done'!  The combined forces of the State Department and the Pentagon were insistent that given Obama's earlier warning this was a direct challenge to his authority - which it was!  Nevertheless, Obama, in an act of real political courage, ignored his own previous words and defied the entire Washington establishment.  He refused to commit American ground troops into Syria.

Now you could say that he was a dummkopf, himself, for drawing his red line in the first place, and you would be right but, a shrewd man acknowledging a mistake, will not double down on that mistake, and Obama didn't.  'Praise the Lord and don't pass the ammunition' because I dread to think of where a 'boots on the ground' invasion of Syria would have led.  My guess is that it would have solved nothing and that Arlington cemetery would have been filled to capacity!

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

(Alas, duty calls and I must set forth and begin to deliver the first of a thousand VOTE LEAVE pamphlets to the long-suffering folk of downtown Milborne Port but, like Gen. MacArthur, 'I shall return!' to continue on this subject.)

 

This alone would be reason enough to VOTE LEAVE

The Turks are coming!  The Turks are coming!  Forget all about the pros and cons of being in or out of the EU, this week's total surrender to Turkish blackmail tells you all you need to know about the immediate future for Europe.  It is irritating but understandable for us to pay the Turks 'dirt money' to take back unwanted immigrants and refugees.  It is, after all, no different from the deal struck by the Aussies to pay Malaysia and Indonesia to take Asian immigrants caught trying to enter.  Also, it is a means by which the people smuggling business will be put under pressure.  However, the EU/Turkey deal goes much further and invites an even worse outcome.

For a start, I would not wish to be a Kurd living in Turkey over the next few years.  The money we ladle out to the Turkish government will be used to beef up their military and security services in order to allow the dictatorial Erdogan regime to undertake a severe campaign against the Kurdish people living in Turkey.  Erdogan, and I suspect most Turks, hate them and if the Kurds can be eliminated or pushed out into Syria, or anywhere, the Turks will be happy.  And they will do that using EU money, or our money as I like to think of it!

Secondly, and as far as Europeans are concerned, most importantly, the EU leaders have promised to fast track Turkey's entry into the EU which, under the ludicrous Schengen agreement, means that some 77 million Turks will able to travel and move about inside Europe without visa restrictions.  It also means that the borders of the EU will reach Syria!

I have said it before, as other have said it and probably more eloquently, the EU is an increasingly huge and heavy, man-made construct balanced on a pin-point which is bound to collapse probably sooner rather than later.  When it does the wreckage and damage will be enormous, far, far in excess of any piffling problems we are likely to meet following a Brexit.  Don't wait like the people on the Titanic for the mighty ship to hit the iceberg, take to the boats NOW!

VOTE LEAVE!

Thank God for the good old 'Speccie'

Look, I know I'm an opinionated fella', well, I wouldn't 'Bore for Britain' on this blog if I didn't have a view about most things and, as regular readers will have discerned, detailed knowledge or experience are very definitely optional extras.  However, even I realise that there are some subjects which are simply to complex for me ever to understand - quantum physics, for example, or women, or putting up shelves, those sorts of things, and therefor, by and large, I avoid them.  Another example is the Middle East.  As a subject, to paraphrase Churchill's much wittier saying in reference to the enigma that is Russia, the Middle East is spaghetti wrapped in a yarn of wool tied up with a ball of string!

Now before my resident archivist, JK, starts to dig up the myriad opinions I have expressed on this abstruse subject in the past, let me apologise and offer up a mea culpa!  I will even apologise to the poor politicians whose task it is to devise and implement policy in this swampland of contradictions.  Truly may it be said that if you locked ten Middle East inhabitants into a room they would emerge with fifteen solutions - and actually, only five of them would probably emerge at all!

All this has arisen in my mind because of an article in this week's 'Speccie' by Mr. Paul Wood of the BBC.  Hitherto, I had assumed that in the maelstrom that is the Middle East there was at least one homogenous entity (apart from Israel, that is) on whom some level of certainty could be placed - the Kurds.  Given that everyone (except possibly the Israelis) hates them and wishes to destroy them, I had assumed that they at least were definable.  Oh dear, wrong again!

As Mr. Wood explains, on the basis of some considerable, up-close experience, the Kurds, like every other 'tribe' in the God-forsaken khazi that is the Middle East, are as much at war with each other as they are with everyone else.  So I give up!  I shall no longer offer my shrewd and practical geo-strategic suggestions to our glorious(?) leaders except to emphasise that absolutely under no circs should they allow a single pair of British boots to set foot anywhere in the wretched place and they should bend all their efforts into sending back every single refugee!

In the meantime, allow me to urge you all to read Mr. Wood's excellent article - oh, and while your at it, take out a subscription to The Spectator!

The war between Saudi Arabia and America continues

What?  You mean you haven't noticed?  Well you will when you fill your car for about £1 a gallon!  The Saudis decided some time ago that they were going to crush the American shale oil industry which threatened to cut their own petro-dollar industry off at the knees.  The fact that Obama has spent most of his presidency cuddling up to their main enemy, Iran,  has not helped.  But the great question is - will it work?

Not according to A E-P in today's Telegraph:

America's shale oil producers and Canada's oil sands will come roaring back from late 2017 onwards once the current brutal purge is over, a cycle it described as the "rise, fall and rise again" of the fracking industry.

"Anybody who believes the US revolution has stalled should think again. We have been very surprised at how resilient it is," said Neil Atkinson, head of oil markets at the International Energy Agency.

The Saudi policy of flooding the market has worked to a certain degree but one unexpected result has been the phenomenal increase in efficiency which the 'frackers' have accepted with relish.  Yes, many of the shale companies are facing financial difficulties but new investors are lying in wait ready to pick up the pieces as soon as the market improves.  Meanwhile, back in Saudi, formerly gushing revenues have been reduced drastically to trickle level and as always these hardships effect the ordinary people most to the point where even the Saudi royals might begin to feel uneasy, living as they do in the most revolutionary region in the world.

Interesting times - dammit!

Your Sunday 'Cough 'n' Sneeze': 10.1.16

There's always a silver lining to every dark cloud.  Thus, the fact that I constantly dissolve into monumental coughing and sneezing fits means that today my occasional Sunday thoughts will be, for a change, brief and to the point!

More Met Office lies:   The indefatigable  Christopher Booker points to yet more dishonest agitprop from the utterly useless Met Office.  December was not the wettest December on record - as Met Office records show!  Why are we forced to pay for these dishonest ratbags to lie to us constantly.  Privatise the Met Office NOW!

 

Waddya mean, I didn't win?   There was £66 million quid up on offer at the National Con-trick Lottery yesterday and so I graciously allowed the 'Memsahib' to buy a ticket.  For years now I have been telling her that it's the worst bet in the world but she merely smiles at me sweetly and says that someone has to win.  Well, of course, I certainly deserve to win - but I didn't!  Again!  It's a fix, I tell you!

 

A 'creative' artist in all senses:   I am grateful to the Art Contrarian for these two examples of art from an unexpected source:

 

The artist was the late, great Richard Feynman, of whom it could be rightly asked, was there anything that man could not do?  All of which reminds me that I have some of his lectures bookmarked and I will get round to them, honestly, just as soon as I find my brain!

 

The US and UK back opposite sides:    I am trying to think, and with a head full of snot that isn't easy, when was the last time that the UK dared to back the opposite side to the USA in a foreign dispute?  Of course, the USA wobbled a bit over the Falklands dispute but eventually they came good.  But today, the UK is firmly, but discretely, in support of Saudi Arabia whilst the USA hands over the keys of the mint to Iran.  In the unlikely event that these two ghastly but utterly inept states actually go to war then Anglo-American relations could come under severe strain.  As so often, the Streetwise Professor sums up the pros and cons of Saudi vs. Iran and comes to the shrewd assessment that both are as useless as each other and that no-one but a fool would support either of them.

 

From the mouths of babes and sucklings and Chinese immigrants:   Paco has an interesting quote from a recent Chinese immigrant into the USA:

If you believe more gun control by your government is going to save lives, you are being naïve. The champion of all the mass killings in this world is always a tyrannical government.

George Orwell couldn't have put it better!

 

Would you shake hands with this man?  No, no, I don't mean 'el Chapo', I mean Sean Pennis, the well known Hollywood dick!

To paraphrase a line from a film made when Hollywood made great films, 'of all the people in all the world' who would choose to shake hands with a Mexican drug-dealing mass murderer?  Well now we know, so if you're unfortunate enough to shake hands with Sean Pennis in the near future, make sure to wash your hands afterwards and whatever you do don't sniff them!

 

An excellent Orwell quotation:   Talking of Orwell, as I was a couple of spots up above, I am grateful to Daniel Greenfield of the Sultan Knish site who supplied this one in his personal bio:

"We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men."

Mr. Greenfield is worth following as his latest post demonstrates - and not just because it confirms my own views.  The essence of the piece is contained in the title: America doesn't have a gun problem, it has a Democrat problem.  Well worth reading!

 

Timing, as in sex and drumming, etc:   Yes my favourite phrase but what could be more appropriate when we learn that the Germans have permitted Mein Kampf to be republished just after several zillion Muslim immigrants were invited in by the 'Kaiserin' and today we learn that the first edition has sold out!  Do I hear a ghostly chuckle from 'down below'?

  

 

No more coughs 'n' sneezes today

Old Duff's Almanac 2016

My forecast for 2016.  What could go wrong, will go wrong.  What absolutely and definitely can't possibly go wrong, will also go wrong.  And it will rain!  Yes, I know I have thus covered all eventualities but it is necessary for me to do so on this distinguished blog because the regular commenters here are a mean-spirited bunch of nit-pickers eager to pounce on my slightest error of judgment.  Even so, I will attempt to be a little more specific.

There is, it seems to me, only one truly major global problem hanging over our heads and that is China.  The only good news is that things might not come to a head in 2016 although the last few months of Obama's lacklustre leadership might tempt the Chinese to push their luck before next November.  If, God help us all, 'The Donald', takes over then all bets are off!  No-one knows what 'The Donald' would do if the Chinese shoot down an American aircraft over the disputed waters of the South China Sea - even 'The Donald'!  However, that will all be in in 2017.

International finance is always a global problem and the crazy behaviour of the Saudi's as they set about destroying the OPEC cartel has ramifications for all of us.  However, in the meantime just let's enjoy the cheap oil while it's here.  Perhaps of more critical importance is the stability of the Saudi royal leadership.  They can continue to 'flash the cash' in the casinos of the world just so long as they maintain a rising standard of living for their own people whilst simultaneously supporting a vicious religious apparat.  However, their national revenues have fallen so short this year that they have been forced to slash their budgets.  At the same time, the door to female emancipation - dread words to nearly all Saudi men - has just been nudged open, only by a smidgeon in allowing women to stand for local council positions but that could be the start of something big in the hitherto rigid, male-dominated society of Saudi Arabia.  Internal ructions there will - if it's possible to imagine - turn the Middle East into an even greater frenzy than it is in already.  (Note to Dave: don't, whatever you do, go there!)

I read somewhere today that the Ukraine is sliding into bankruptcy and it might tempt 'Vlad the Impaler' to finish eating the apple out of which he has already taken one big bite.  Personally, I remain unperturbed.  If he wishes to add a another bankrupt state to the bankrupt state over which he already rules, then I say good luck with that one, Vlad!  Alas, the problem, when and if it should arise, will arouse major 'huffing 'n' puffing' from the Euro fanatics, no doubt with encouragement from Washington.  (Note to Dave: don't, whatever you do, go there either!)  With a bit of luck, 'Vlad', having become very used to his reputation as "a great war leader" - yeeeeeees, quite! - might decide to chance his arm in the Ukraine before our EU referendum which will help to persuade even more Brits to VOTE LEAVE!

Here, in 'this septic Isle', the only truly critical decision is the EU referendum.  As it stands today, I fear that the majority will vote to stay in unless "events, dear boy, events" suddenly tip the balance the other way.  The only convulsive action taken by the 'Great British Public' in my lifetime was the decision in 1945 to vote into power a doctrinaire socialist government.  This was hugely influenced by the hundreds of thousands of returning servicemen who were determined to improve their lot - suckers!  It took the next generation to grow up and realise that socialism was Grand Larceny by another name!  Today we have another doctrinaire socialist party and another entirely new generation to swallow their nonsense whole.  I think - I hope - that the Tories will see off this threat but they will do so only if they remain united.  However, there are two matters that will be hugely influential in threatening Tory unity.  The first is the EU referendum in which it can be truly stated that on the Right "there will be blood"!  The second is the propensity for 'Dave 'n' George' to move the party to the Left in order to drive the Labour party even further to Marxist socialist extremes.  This will leave space on the Right and, 'as any fule do no', nature abhors a vacuum.

Anyway, that is my almanac for 2016 but as that very shrewd operator, Mr. Donald Rumsfeld - what is it about these 'Donalds'? - once said, it's the 'unknown unknowns' that are the problem!

 

'To bomb or not to bomb, that is the question'

I have tried, dammit, I have really tried, to find some, any, good reason why we should toss in our two pennies worth of bombs into Syria.  'Dim Dave', whose strategic abilities are, shall we say, not immediately obvious, and our Defence Minister who strikes me as a honking, know-nothing puppet with an Air Marshall's arm up the back of his jacket, do not fill me with confidence that they have the remotest idea of any long, medium or even short term aims and objectives likely to be achieved.  The only absolute certainty which even a modest knowledge of military history will teach y0u is that the only definite result will be 'unforeseen circumstances'!

Already, 'Dim Dave's' claim to 70k plus "moderate" Muslims just waiting for half a dozen RAF aircraft to give them the signal to rise up against ISIL is melting under a downpour of healthy scepticism.  Alternatively, he suggests that we owe it to the 'Frogs' to stand side by side with them in their hour of torment following the Paris atrocity.  Call me 'Mr. Cynical' but my strong perception is that the French don't give a flying frog's leg for Britain, not least when you consider the aid and assistance they provided for thousands of Muslims to be bussed and trained up to Calais where huge camps were provided for their comfort prior to them mounting illegal attempts to cross the Channel

The other siren song from No.10 is that we must stand by our ally, the USA.  It is perfectly obvious even to the purblind that 'Ol Big Ears' has absolutely no intention of doing anything other than the bare minimum to intervene in the caliphate.  Frankly, I don't blame him.  So why, one wonders, is 'Dim Dave' so eager to participate?  It can't just be to embarrass the Labour party, they are managing that on a daily, even hourly, basis all on their own.  I think the real reason can be deduced from Dave's demeanour before the cameras today, and his performance in the House of Commons tomorrow.  You can see from the way those little lips are pursed to show just how really, really determined he is to be 'A Great War Leader'.

Alas, he is not, he is just a total prat!

 

OK, I give up, my brain's hurting!

A few days ago I wrote a post pointing out the incredible complexities behind the so-called 'war against ISIL' in the heartlands of their caliphate.  Everybody and his uncle seems to  be in on the act so it's amazing really that ISIS continues to flourish against such an array of foes.  But of course, everybody and his uncle are in it for very different reasons almost none of which are concerned with just ridding the world of this pestilential bunch of psychos.

It was 'SoD' (well done, my boy, good to see you inherited your father's intelligence gene!) who pointed us all to the oil trade which provides ISIL with much of their cash - although not all of it by any means.  Yesterday, Bloomberg picked up on earlier reports concerning this huge illicit oil trade and pointed the finger firmly at the American government and its useless intelligence and financial departments for egregious errors of judgment.  The Americans assumed that ISIL was living off refined oil and therefore they launched attacks against refinery plants and storage depots.  However, ISIL simply changed to selling crude oil delivered around their caliphate by truck to a thousand and one 'Billy basic' refineries that supplied the needs of their local communities.

This massive operation seemed to have evaded the notice of American intelligence:

• U.S. intelligence had grossly overestimated the damage they’d inflicted during airstrikes on the militants’ oil production apparatus last year, while underestimating Islamic State’s oil revenue by $400 million. According to U.S. Department of the Treasury officials and data they released in the wake of the Paris mayhem, the terrorist group is actually taking in $500 million from oil a year. What’s more, just a few hours before the first Islamic State suicide bomber blew himself up outside the Stade de France on Nov. 13, U.S. Army Colonel Steve Warren conceded at a press briefing that some American airstrikes disrupted IS oil operations for no more than a day or two.

Apparently it was only in May, following a raid by US Special Forces on an ISIL HQ that the Americans realised the change in the distribution of oil and the true size of the market which, of course, extends well beyond the borders of the caliphate into the territories of neighbours who are supposed to be our allies!  Actually, I'm not at all sure that the American agencies were unaware of what was going on which makes me wonder what the real American game is.  After all, the Russians haven't been in it for that long but as Zero Hedge reports, with a video to support the story, they have been attacking the ISIL lorries for some time.  It's worth looking at that Russian video not least because I cannot believe, given the surveillance technology available to the Americans, that they failed to notice all those lorries until just a few months ago!  And if they did notice them, why didn't they attack them much earlier?  Or to put it another way, what exactly is the American game?

The golden rule in any scandal is 'always follow the money' and 'Tyler Durden' at Zero Hedge does exactly that by asking, very pointedly, who exactly are the middle-men in this enormous trade for very cheap caliphate crude oil?  He points a suggestive finger at various huge international commodity traders and it would be interesting to know if any of them are large contributors to the Democrat party in the USA!  The excuse by the American military authorities that they were reluctant to bomb the lorries because they might kill or injure the drivers is the stuff of Monty Python!

In the meantime, we and in particular, the French, continue to fly along acting as 'tail-gunners' to the USAF, bombing anything and everything except the really important targets.  'Dim Dave', needless to say, wishes desperately to 'strut his hour upon the stage' by taking an even greater role in this useless bombing campaign.  I would suggest that he pays a visit to Washington first and after shaking Obama firmly by the throat, demands to know precisely what aims the American government is really pursuing in the Middle East.

 

Absolutely the very best analysis of the ISIS situation anywhere!

I have a busy schedule today, er, well, it's busy by elderly, retired, old fart standards, that is!  Anyway, I am going to save time by indulging my kleptomania and lifting a chunk of just the very best analysis of the so-called war against ISIL by Richard Spencer, the Middle East correspondent for The Telegraph.  I have not read such clear thinking anywhere else.  'Dim Dave' should be made to learn it by heart.  This is only an extract but the whole thing is worth reading:

•The Americans - and the British at least among their allies - want Isil to go but think it will take a properly trained ground force to get rid of it and are not prepared to commit troops, for domestic political reasons. President Obama, additionally, believes that there is no point defeating Isil while the conditions that led to its rise are in place, such as localised sectarian conflict, though he has no real notion of how to get rid of those conditions.

•Some elements in the Iraqi government may genuinely want to see the country reunited at all costs but others realise that if the Sunnis in Iraq return to the national fold the Shia majority will have to share power with them. Currently, Shia supremacist parties hold sway. These Shia parties are linked to the Shia militias that are fighting Isil on the ground - but signally failing to attack them in Sunni Arab strongholds like Fallujah and Mosul.

•The Assad regime's strategy presumably sees it eventually taking on Isil, but over most of the civil war its main enemy has been non-Isil rebels, who pose a more direct threat to regime heartlands. Having Isil fight them simultaneously has not been a bad thing.

•The Iranians don’t want Isil to gain ground but having a Sunni bogeyman, for whose existence they can blame their Sunni foes in the Gulf, has a certain use. The existence of Isil also prevents Sunni Arab states presenting a united face against their own ambitions.

•The Gulf states want to keep Isil down but they also see Isil as a lesser enemy than Iran, and certainly aren’t going to waste forces attacking fellow Sunnis that they could be using to fight Shia proxies in Yemen.

•Russia has ruled out sending ground troops, and has mostly targeted non-Isil rebels with its bombing campaign, since it believes the priority is to preserve the Assad regime. As these rebels are also fighting Isil, this has had the unfortunate effect of actually helping Isil advance in some areas, even as it cedes ground to Russian-backed regime forces in others.

•Turkey has made clear its main enemy is the Kurdish PKK, rather than Isil.

•The Kurds have a track record of success against Isil in both Iraq and Syria - thanks in part to their alliance with the US and other western air forces. But they have little interest in pushing beyond Kurdish territory. In Iraq, the Peshmerga took Sinjar last week, not Mosul. 

Before Presidente Hollande mounts his horse, draws his sabre and charges into war with ISIL he should take a look over his shoulder and see just how many chers amis who have been loudly pledging their total support for La France in recent days are actually galloping along behind him.   'Oui, tout a fait' which translates, so I am informed, into 'yeeeeeeees, quite'!

ADDITIONAL:   Entirely by coincidence I caught this piece over at The American Thinker which just about sums up the BS quality of this so-called 'war' against ISIL.  This picture, originally in The Daily Mail, shows the exact spot in which 'Jihad John' was sent to enjoy his 72 virgins! 

You will have noticed, of course, that poor old ex-John was actually surrounded by some exceedingly juicy targets which if obliterated would have caused severe damage to ISIL - but they were ignored!

So what, exactly and precisely, are our glorious leaders playing at?

 

As good a summation of contemporary Islam as you will read anywhere

I will not attempt to summarise an article in The Telegraph written by Husain Haqqani, senior fellow at the Hudson Institute in Washington DC and previously Pakistan's Ambassador to Washington, because it is worth reading in full.  It is brief and to the point and explains the main historic and social pressures which have led to schism within the Muslim world.  It convinces me that as well as the drones and rockets and special forces and secret services, we also need to wage a propaganda war of the highest quality to assist those brave Muslims holding out against the antediluvian nihilism of the jihadists and the caliphate.

 

 

 

Pity the poor policy makers!

And before you moan about my title please note the 'irony-alert' exclamation mark at the end.  Here at D&N in a long comment thread we already have an indication of the sort of squabbles that the real policy makers will indulge as they struggle to come to terms with the rise and rise and rise of the caliphate.  Should you doubt what a devilish, tricky and dangerous problem it is, please take time to read a first-rate article by John R. Bradley in this week's Spectator written before the events in Paris. Here is his final paragraph: 

• The caliphate hopes the Cold War mentality in Washington and the insatiable desire to feed at the trough of Arab despots there and everywhere else will undermine any effort to destroy it, even if a new international coalition of the willing is eventually created. The caliph and his successors are in this for the long haul, and a close reading of their propaganda reveals a truly apocalyptic scenario. Their strategy depends principally on an uprising in Saudi Arabia, which would plunge the global economy into a catastrophic depression. Jordan, a Saudi client state where Islamists are the only serious opposition and where the King is considered a laughing stock, would immediately fall, leaving the soldiers of the caliph free to focus on their most anticipated battle for the ‘liberation’ of Jerusalem. It sounds fanciful and far-fetched, to the point of being ridiculous. But so did everything the caliph was saying two years ago about what we are quickly resigning ourselves to calling a terrifying new world order.

The caliphate has now declared war on France for fairly obvious reasons - there is a huge pool of disaffected Muslims grinding out miserable existences in the banlieues of Paris, Marseilles and other big cities.  These massive populations are re-enforced regularly and easily from across the Med.  They provide the 'ocean in which the killer sharks can swim'!  It is noteworthy that Hollande's first act on news of this latest atrocity was to close France's borders - au revoir, Schengen, it was fun knowing you! Also, of course, France is a leading and belligerent participant in the bombing of Syria.  Well, if you dish it out you must expect it back again!

All of that, for the moment, is France's problem but now we must look to London and of course, without giving it too much in the way of thought, Dave appears before the cameras pursing his little lips - always a danger sign! - to assure everyone that we stand side by side with France in their adversity.  Er, but do we?  Or perhaps a better question is, should we?  Well, you might say, we can't possibly let down a friendly nation under attack from a wicked bunch of murderers, dammit, it's not British.  Well, actually, it is, just ask any Czech born before 1938!  Real-politik is a despicable, shitty activity which is why we elect politicians to do it for us because, as 'any fule do no', most politicians are despicable and shitty!  So we must hope (fat chance!) that Dave and his advisers think long and hard before indulging in useless but potentially highly dangerous gestures.  I would remind him that Hollande's government did precious little for us in dealing with the immigrant hordes camped at Calais.

All that, of course, is tactical rather than strategic.  What our (less than) glorious leaders need to do is refine a sensible strategy that can be agreed with our 'allies', that is, one with which we can contribute meaningfully, and one in which the likely re-action from the enemy is clearly understood by both our leaders and the people.  There is a range of possibilities for the British government.  At one end, we simply retire to our Island citadel, stop bombing in Iraq, withdraw from the EU, deploy troops to guard our ports and make people smuggling an offence liable to life imprisonment.  Or, at the other end of the scale, we (by which I mean the UK, France and America and anyone else willing to join in) declare war on the caliphate and we use every means at our disposal to utterly destroy it in its homelands.  Of course, and I'm trying not to snigger at this, we might have to wait until the French finish building our aircraft carriers and the Yanks flog us some aircraft before we can do very much!

Needless to say because you know it already in your heart of hearts, 'Dim Dave' will do something utterly wishy-washy which will be dangerous but totally ineffective.

You'll never go broke under-estimating the GBP

Today I watched and listened on TV to a fat, mouthy British housewife tearing into Her Majesty's Ambassador to Egypt.  She was but one amongst thousands of British tourists stranded in Sharm el-Sheikh following the terrorist attack on the Russian plane a few days earlier.  Needless to say, 'Mrs Gobby's' complaints had all the effect on the smooth glacis of the Ambassador's impeccable double-breasted suit as a burst of bullets hitting a Tiger tank!  He looked concerned.  He nodded politely.  He soothed with smooth words.  And I wonder if perhaps, inside, he was thinking the same as me - who, with more than three brain cells, would even consider anywhere in the Middle East, let alone the Sinai which even the Egyptian government cannot control, as a suitable and sensible destination to take your family on holiday?  You don't need the deaths of two hundred-plus Russians to know that the entire Middle East is, and has been now for years, a murderous fester-pit in which an open season has been declared on anyone and everyone but with special prizes - you know, several dozen virgins and all that sort of thing - for those who can slaughter Europeans or Americans.

So, 'Mrs. Gobby', my questions to you, which H.M.'s Ambassador was too polite to raise, are very simple - where have you been for the last five years? - do you ever watch a news programme on the TV? - do you ever read the news page in a newspaper? - and finally, when did you have your lobotomy?  Personally speaking, I hope you will be trapped out there for months!