Blog powered by Typepad

« The Sunday Rumble 16/3/08 | Main | There's a slant-eyed yellow peril to the north of Kathmandu! »

Tuesday, 18 March 2008

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnNWbTlucl0

Oh God, 'DM', I nearly fell off my chair laughing at that one!

"I cannot help feeling that anyone who chucks a glass of water over a lawyer cannot be entirely bad..."

Funnily enough, I had the same feeling, albeit fleeting. The barrister should have thanked her, it actually improved her - that 'before' hairstyle was the pits!

Sigh. I've told people a thousand times - do not exaggerate!
Not "per night" - per 2.5 hrs. And it was $4300, a sum that included remaining balance for past services rendered, current bill and deposit for the later date. Ashley-girl wasn't even a 3-diamond functionary; her rate was a meagre $2000/hr! The girl's loot wouldn't even pay for a half-month rent in UWS, let alone a session in decent tanning salon and a pedicure, for xristsake.


I'm not turning on that video...I'm at work and US legal system is our client!

Sigh. I've told people a thousand times - do not exaggerate!
Not "per night" - per 2.5 hrs. And it was $4300, a sum that included remaining balance for past services rendered, current bill and deposit for the later date. Ashley-girl wasn't even a 3-diamond functionary; her rate was a meagre $2000/hr! The girl's loot wouldn't even pay for a half-month rent in UWS, let alone a session in decent tanning salon and a pedicure, for xristsake.


I'm not turning on that video...I'm at work and US legal system is our client!

Ouch, Julia! You ladies really know how slip the knife between the ribs. Mind you, she really did not look amused when she left court. I wonder if she'll sue 'Stumpy' for the price of a new hair-do?

Tatyana, er, you seem to have considerable expertise on this subject, so perhaps you can tell me what, given that Spitzer paid for 2.5 hours, did he do during the remaining 2 hours 27.5 minutes? You understand that, putting it delicately, I am judging this man by my own experience and the fact that the little 'Memsahib' used to show increasing signs of irritation (always a warning sign!) were my heroic efforts to take longer than 2.5 minutes, er, not that they did very often, of course!

Please don't worry about 'DM's' video. I can assure you that even the US legal system would have a laugh at it.

Wrong perspective, DD. In Spitz' case, he was not the one rendering the services, so 2.5 min timeline is inapplicable. And as you probably know ladies take an awful looong time preparing for the party.

I might be mistaken, of course - but then so is my source.

Tatyana, I surrender to your superior knowledge!

I concur with Dearieme. McCartney's lawyer should be thanking her. Take that photo to the stylist and ask them to give her the drenched cat look, it suits her. Bouffants rarely look good on anyone.

The comments to this entry are closed.