Blog powered by Typepad

« Judge Beverley 'Cocklecarrot' Lunt - she should be locked up! | Main | Murder Inc. #31 (Mar 08) »

Tuesday, 01 April 2008

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

They are a pretty uninspiring bunch, aren't they.

But, are the men any better? Miliband, Balls, etc?

Well, Miliband comes under another of my vaguely defined categories - 'girly men'!

Balls is a different animal altogether, I think. When he was hidden in the Treasury sharpening 'Broon's' pencils he failed to make much of an impression on me except, of course, that anyone in 'Broon's' Treasury obviously had difficulty spelling 'economics' let alone understanding it. Now that he's out and about under the creepy, Stalinist title of Minister for Children I really do believe he is a malignant and highly dangerous influence in government. He alone might be enough to get me off my backside to vote for 'Dave'. In fact I have been meaning to post something on Mr and Mrs Balls ... perhaps tomorrow if I can summon the energy.

Poor, poor ...er..lady(?): to become Mrs. Balls is to ask for trouble already.

read the senntence Balls is a different animal altogether 3 times. Have been contemplating all possible meanings ever since.

Just don't take it literally, Tatyana!

It's hurting my work performance!
I demand compensation.

Where have I heard this before? Oh yeah. It usually goes something like this:

"Before any of my black readers beat me up let me stress that my question is directed at 'niggers', a very, very different class of negro from those I would call 'blacks'. Please don't ask me to define 'niggers', it is a category, like pornography, that defies definition but you know it when you see it."

Here's">http://www.instapunk.com/archives/InstaPunkArchiveV2.php3?a=1306">Here's a recent example.

(I saw in my in-box that a new message had been left by some one called 'Mack Daddy', and I though that that sounds amusing, and he's new on this particular block so he might be fun. Then I read his clodhopping, peurile comment and reminded myself that people with silly pseudo-names are usually, er, silly.)

Sorry, 'Mack Daddy', I couldn't be bothered to read your example because I suspect that anything of which you approved would be about as attractive to me as last week's porridge. Er, have a nice day!

My comment was no more ridiculous than your own version.

And I don't endorse the stuff at the end of that link, so in all likelihood it's something that you would, on the contrary, rather enjoy.

The comments to this entry are closed.