In a thread down below I have been discussing the nature of 'Art' with my e-pal, 'Bongers'. I used the example of Paul Klee's so-called 'magic squares'. Here is an example and I would be delighted if any, or all of you, tell me what your reaction to it is.
A jolly duvet cover for a daughter's bed.
Posted by: dearieme | Monday, 06 April 2009 at 13:14
Hahahaha! I can't do better than dearie me.
Posted by: Sister Wolf | Monday, 06 April 2009 at 20:51
At a first glance, I think there is nothing to it.
But I like looking at it.
Posted by: Andis Kaulins | Tuesday, 07 April 2009 at 01:28
I must say I have always had a special fondness for Klee. "Nothing to it" perhaps, but such "nothing" as I would never be capable of. His paintings simply make me happy.
Posted by: Malcolm Pollack | Tuesday, 07 April 2009 at 04:35
Hogwash! Piffle! Balderdash! Fiddle-faddle! Poppycock! Tomfoolery!
But very nice.
Posted by: Jackson's Pollocks | Thursday, 09 April 2009 at 23:39