Blog powered by Typepad

« Richard North: standing up for blogs - and good jokes! | Main | The 'LibDums' achieve the impossible - they make even bigger prats of themselves! »

Monday, 09 May 2011


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

One can reach out with an M16, can't one?

Of course, you can, DM, but not too far lest it spoil your aim!

I don't know much about Mr Bolt and his works but I do know he is considered a raving lunatic by a majority of the population of Australia.
A lot of people are suing him currently about allegedly racist remarks he has made.

Andra, I'm not Australian, but I'm a frequent reader of Bolt's blog and even Tim Blair's blog. I think both fill a need in the political spectrum. I'm aware of the charge of racism against Bolt, but to a non-Australian, the charge seems tenuous at best -- I do admit, however, that Australia's race relations are unlike America's. I hope you, and David, and others, will keep open the possibility that Bolt is being sued because of his politics, with racism serving as a convenient weapon. Mark Steyn had similar problems in Canada.

I'll go and have a look at some of his writings.
I do read the Herald Sun on line every day but haven't spent any time with Mr. Bolt. Probably just because his reputation precedes him.
I'll make my own mind up now.
Thanks for the nudge Dom.

Well, I have read a few of Mr Bolt's articles and I stand corrected.
So far I have no argument with what I have read so far and I will read some more.

Hello David, and thank you for your response, for which I have a few comments.


There is a significant contrast between these two men. For one, Dr. Mengele showed little regret or remorse for his crimes, and he forced the deaths of innocent prisoners. Mengele was known for his cruelty, and for his experiments on human beings in the name of Eugenics.

As for Dr. Nathanson, all the women who came to him wanted to kill their babies in the name of Women´s Rights and freedom of responsibility. But Nathanson repented and for decades did much to stop abortion.

Interestingly, the at the Nuremberg trials after WWII, the Nazis who were accused of atrocities had rationalized that they did nothing wrong, as they were merely following their own laws. But they were told that they broke a higher law, namely, Natural Law.


Understand the difference between loving someone and liking someone. Love in the Christian sense of charity toward neighbor is a faculty of the will---not emotion. Liking someone is an emotion.

To show you that true love is in the will and not an emotion, I will give you an example:

Two mothers who said they loved their sickly babies.

When the crying child woke the first mother in the middle of the night, she did not feel like tending to her baby, but nevertheless the mother rose from her bed despite her slumber and tended to the sick child.

The second mother heard her sick baby crying in the middle of the night, and she knew that she should get up to tend her child. Instead she slammed the door shut to muffle the sounds so as not to be bothered because she didn't feel like getting up.

Sacrificial love is not an emotion, it is a decision to do what is right and good. I may not feel like forgiving someone who seeks my forgiveness, but as a Catholic Christian I am called to forgive, and must call on God to give me the grace (empower my weak human will) to do what I am called to do.

Incidentally, the English Language is that it only has one word for love, and can be used to say "I love my spouse" or "I love pizza". The love spoken about in the Sacred Scripture is from the Greek word Agape, which signifies a self-sacrificing volitional act.

You see, Christianity isn't easy. I am called to pray for my enemies, and to even do good to those who persecute me. This is what Christ meant when He said: "If any man will follow me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me"(Mark 8:34). The cross may seem like a stumbling block, but it is one we must embrace, as it is the means which God uses to purify and sanctify the human soul.

In other words, no pain, no gain. This is the paradigm which governs all accomplishments worth crowning: The pain of study produces perfect score. The pain of excruciating practice blossoms into world class violinists. The pain of exercise builds a man's muscles and beautifies the body. The pain of forgiveness brings peace'''and makes the soul grow closer to its ultimate end: God.

Christianity is not easy, and forgiveness is sometimes very hard to do. But all things are possible with God because He empowers those who seek His sanctifying grace.


If you're truly sorry for breaking my window, I could choose to forgive you, yet still ask that you pay restitution for the damage you caused to my property.

But since I am a free agent and have dominion over my own choices, I could choose NOT to forgive you despite your sincere sorrow. Instead, I could choose to seek revenge and throw a big fat brick through your window just so you know what it's like to have a broken window.

The first example uses the intellect and will in the name of peace, justice, and goodness. The second example acts in the name of anger, which might satisfy my festering rage as I relish the fact that I destroyed your window to bits, but in the end the act of revenge does not make me any better.

Love and forgiveness is an act of the will in the name of what is good. To not forgive and to seek revenge often simply mimics what the perpetrator did. This does not mean we have to be against the death penalty, which society has a right to employ in order to defend the sacredness of innocent human life, and to draw a line in the sand as a testament that certain lines must never be crossed.

Christians are called to forgive those who harm us, and to pray for our enemies, so that enemies may repent of their ways and seek peace, justice and goodness. Forgiveness has different degrees of expression, depending on the closeness a person has to God (Who is Truth, Goodness, and Love itself). The closer a man is to God the more he operate with God's grace, which empowers a mere man to want to forgive the offender.

God always forgives those who seek His forgiveness, and He calls upon wicked men to repent of their wicked ways. But wicked men are free to not repent and to reject God's grace. "Hell" is merely the consequence for those who do not repent and choose to separate themselves from God (Truth, Goodness and Love) for all eternity.


Every single day in the United States of America alone, there are thousands of human beings being slaughtered through abortion. But not all doctors who perform abortions repent and regret their actions---or try to put the monster of abortion in America back to its cage.

Dr. Nathanson was not a saint, but he himself acknowledged that his actions were monstrous. Once he faced this truth about abortion, he did much to stop it. After his conversion to the pro-life cause he produced the film "The Silent Scream" and the documentary "Eclipse of Reason", which exposed the abortion procedures in graphic detail in an effort to sway the public against the horrors of abortion. Both films made a huge impact on the abortion debate and his books also exposed the deceptive origins of the abortion industry.

Now, this does not make up for all the deaths he legally presided over, but he is one who truly repented and regretted his actions and did much to save many children from abortion. In his biography he wrote:

“Abortion is now a monster so unimaginably gargantuan that even to think of stuffing it back into its cage is ludicrous beyond words. Yet that is our charge --- a herculean endeavor.”

Abortion is legal in the U.S.A., and it is through the support of Americans who demand to make it legal that the slaughter continues today.


Believing in the existence in God does not take faith, it takes reason. It takes faith to trust in God's revelation. Thus a man may believe in the existence of a Creator God but the Christian has faith in Jesus Christ .

When you see a airliner jet in the sky, you don't have faith that an intelligent mind designed it. Instead, reason tells you that an intelligent mind designed the airplane. In fact, reason demands it. But it's quite another thing to have be a passenger on the airplane. For that, you've put your faith in the airplane and pilot of the airplane.

As for your pastors telling you that you must have faith, they are right. But this means having faith in God's purpose and design for you, and trust in the teachings of His Son Jesus Christ. Now read what the New Testament tell us about this faith:

"What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? . . . Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by my deeds. You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder. You foolish person, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is useless" James 2:14-20


Again, read carefully: If nothing existed 500 trillion billion years ago, nothing would exist right now, because it is impossible for nothingness to produce anything. But since we exist right now, this is logical proof that something always had to exist.

Scientist will tell you that the "Big Bang" brought time and matter into existence. Thus the Cause of the universe IS outside of time and matter.

All the evidence supports the "Big Bang" theory and has become THE explanation and foundation for modern day astronomy, much like all the evidence supports the Theory of Evolution. Buttressed by the findings of Georges Lemaitre, and later confirmed by the discoveries of Edwind Hubble, the idea of an expanding universe that had a certain beginning is the universal belief among reputable scientists.

I would suggest you watch the History Channel's series on the universe, specifically the episode titled: Beyond the Big Bang, which presents these facts quite beautifully.

Incidentally, the story behind how the Big Bang theory got its name is rather telling. The term itself was coined by an atheist scientist who was mockingly attempting to dismiss the theory, which was first proposed by a Catholic priest and physicist by the name of Georges Lemaitre and which supports the narrative of Scripture in the Book of Genesis, which speaks of an act of creation---a beginning.


There's a reason why we can calculate the exact moment in time for a sunrise 10,000 years from now. This is because of the Laws which Govern the cosmos. The Cosmos is everything that is, and science will show you that the cosmos itself is made up of systems which are in turn governed by Laws. From micro to macro, these systems are everywhere.

Realize and understand thoroughly once and for all that everything within the cosmos is composed of systems which are all interrelated and governed by laws. Even you are made up of unified and dynamic systems. (i.e. Respiratory Skeletal, Muscular, Nervous, Digestive, Reproductive, etc.) No system is independent; rather they are interdependent.

For example:

Your lungs are part of your respiratory system which enables you to breathe oxygen in order for your brain to function. But the oxygen which you breathe is dependent upon the ecosystem, which is dependent upon Earth's atmospheric system, which is dependent upon our Solar System, which is dependent upon our Galactic System, which is dependent upon the laws of the universe.

The universe is comprehensible through logic. We measure the laws of the universe through logical equations. The science of mathematics calculates logic of quantity, logic of shape and logic of arrangement. The universe is teeming with balance, order and proportion. The DNA Code is comprehensible and scientists describe it as a language. Language requires logic. Logic requires intellect. Intellect requires a thinking mind. A thinking, reasoning mind.


You can reason why you don't put milk into your gasoline tank. When you commit evil your conscience reminds you. Human invention fulfills a purpose. This world is full of things with purpose.

All you can reasonably conclude that it all just magically bubbled-up?When you observe architecture do you reason that the mind of an architect was involved? Or do you adamantly demand proof of the architect's existence? Is it not illogical to assume that the architecture accidentally just "bubbled-up?"

Sin is the misuse of the intellect and will. Through sin we introduce disharmony within our life and within our families and within our societies and within out world. We sin when we violate a properly formed conscience. Just as your ears can sense disharmony, your sense of smell can detect a beautiful fragrance---or the stench of a rotting fish. Likewise, your sense of taste can enjoy a delicious warm omelette, or recoil from the taste of rotten food. In the same manner, your conscience reminds you when you've done something evil: Guilt plagues the mind of those who violate their conscience. When remorse and guilt is suppressed, the guilt tends to come out in a myriad of strange complexes and psychological snafus.


The notion that all living things have a soul is not a New Age or a Save The Trees blather. It is basic Christian theology. There is a hierarchy in all living things, and the word "soul" simply describes a unifying principle of the internal activity that exists within all living things. There is no inner activity inside a rock, but there is much activity inside a plant). Plants and animals are highly active organism. By Man has a Rational Soul, with an intellect and a will to know love and serve the Creator---(Truth, Goodness, Love and Beauty). The purpose of human life is to be supremely happy. The only way we can be supremely happy is to be perfectly united with God for all eternity.

To go through life not knowing these things is to be wrong about everything. If a person omits God, they see nothing as it is but everything as it is not---which is the very definition of insanity.

God is not just an extra topic of conversation. God is the explanation of everything. Leave out God. then you leave out the explanation of everything. Science studies what things are made of and how they work. Science cannot tell you what the universe was made for. Only its Maker can do that—because He knows what He had in mind when He made it. And it's not only the universe which you see wrong if you leave out God: You don't see a single thing right:

The Sun is not just an extra item in the sky: We see everything sun-bathed. Likewise, God is not just one more item; we must see everything God-bathed. Only then can one see everything at it really is. Striking against God who sustains our existence is hacking away at our own support. What can be more foolish than that? That's like a person despising the Sun. This is not the mind of a psychologically sane person.

Every civilization has formulated their own ideas about who and what God is. But because the human mind is finite, the infinite God had to reach down to man in order to reveal Himself. Thus we have Divine Revelation unfolding in time and culminating with Jesus Christ who is the Truth, The Life and The Way--God Himself entering history and becoming man for our sake, to lead us to Himself, Who is Truth Goodness and Beauty itself.

Gabriel, thanks.


And the conversation can continue from there.

The comments to this entry are closed.