Well, I expect you have your things to do and for sure I have my things and never the twain will meet, I guess, particularly given that my entire weekend so far has been given over to designing a new PowerPoint talk on the subject of - wait for it - How the Japanese Lost WWII in the First Six Months!
Alright, I have said before, many a time and oft', that everyman's hobby is a total mystery to every other man. But in this case several strands have linked in my life to bring about this particular hobby. First, as you all know, I have a tendency to bore! (I don't know why I put that doubt-inducing exclamation mark at the end because the fact is that I do like to hear the sound of my own voice or to read my own scribblings.) Second, a sort of miracle has occurred in that a technophobe like me - no, that's not quite accurate, I think technoprat is better - has managed, against all odds, to master PowerPoint. Each time I design a new slide filled with ever-more jazzy, snazzy tricks of the trade, I giggle and chortle in total childish pleasure which you will understand better when I tell you that in this house it's the 'Memsahib' who changes electric plugs - on 'elf 'n' safety' grounds!
Finally, of course, the subject matter of most of my talks is history, mostly military history, by which I am endlessly fascinated. It is all so much more satisfying than current affairs because you know the ending! Also, finding out the details of the colossal bollocks dropped by so many 'Very Important People' who are all supposed to be so much cleverer than me is deliciously satisfying. Reading of their errors of omission and commission one feels, with absolute certainty, that one could have done so much better had one been in charge at the time!
As you regulars will know, one of my pet subjects has been the lead up to war between Wilhemine Germany and Great Britain at the beginning of the 20th century. The similarities between those unhappy events and the equally disasterous ones which occurred between Japan and the USA in the 1930s and early '40s is enough to make you weep. Surely, you are tempted to moan, the fools could have seen where it would all end. But they didn't, and that's history, and that's what makes it, for me anyway, totally fascinating. It is also, and I cannot stress this strongly enough, absolutely contemporary. America is facing yet another burgeoning Oriental state with the mother of all inferiority complexes and enough historical resentments to keep them belligerent for decades. It is imperative that presidents and secretaries of state, both now and in the future, read up on their history books and understand what went wrong in the past. Of course, I know this blog is read avidly in the White House and has its own file in the HQ of the CIA, so let me just say that I am available to provide some of my lectures if the Dean of History at Harvard is otherwise occupied. Usual terms, of course!
Anyway, enough of this prattle, the 'Cecil B. de Mille of PowerPoint' has work to do!
"I know this blog is read avidly in the White House and has its own file in the HQ of the CIA, so let me just say that I am available to provide some of my lectures if the Dean of History at Harvard is otherwise occupied. Usual terms, of course!"
Dear Mr. Duff,
We haven't met before, but the team and I are interested in using some of your more advanced Power Point techniques to extract some last titbits of information from some very stubborn Arabs in a place called Camp X-Ray. Psychologists have told us that such methods, delivered by an enthusiastic amateur, create an unbeatable tedium in the mind of the victim.
If you are in for the rest of the day (Our satellites tell us you have pissing rain for the rest of the day, and the church-yard grass is not too bad yet) then stand by to receive my personal call.
Yours,
Barack O.
Posted by: Whyaxye | Monday, 09 April 2012 at 12:53
Ah yes, my PowerPoint - they don't like it up 'em, Capt. Whyaxye!
Posted by: David Duff | Monday, 09 April 2012 at 15:42
Hitler was bound to lose too, taking on the combined might of France, UK, Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark and Norway, while still having to hold down the Czechs and Poles. But he didn't.
The Japan argument is heavy with hindsight.
Posted by: dearieme | Monday, 09 April 2012 at 16:10
Great analogy to the US-China situation. I recently read an article (although I cannot remember where) in which views of Chinese insiders was examined. The Chinese generally viewed the US as a declining power, yet one also determined to keep China's from its rightful place in the world. Substitute China for Germany and the UK for the US, and the sentence could remain the same.
Posted by: attack on Iran | Tuesday, 10 April 2012 at 05:24
I am not absolutely sure you're right in your first statement, DM. If Halifax had taken over from Chamberlain and cut a deal, and if Hitler had held back from attacking Russia, he could have held down Europe for some considerable time, in my view.
Obviously *my* view of Japan is hindsight but others shared it *before* the war, including the head of the Jap navy and army. Adm. Yamamoto wrote this in Aug 1940:
"In the first six to twelve months of a war with the United States and Great Britain I will run wild and win victory upon victory. But then, if the war continues after that, I have no expectation of success."
Posted by: David Duff | Tuesday, 10 April 2012 at 09:07
'AonI', thanks for your comment and welcome to D&N. I have only had chance to give your blog a quick glance but it looks to be very informative.
Posted by: David Duff | Tuesday, 10 April 2012 at 09:11
Yeah, but there were German generals who thought Hitler was bound to lose if he attacked France and Britain. But he won handsomely. It was only when he was mad enough to attack the USSR and declare war on the USA that he really did doom himself to losing.
Posted by: dearieme | Tuesday, 10 April 2012 at 11:08
Quite so, DM, which is why I link Wilhemine Germany and WWII Japan (but not Hitlerian Germany) because both were doomed to defeat before they even began. The first because if the highly risky Schlieffen Plan (Mk II) failed, which it did, then Germany was doomed - in the end. And the second because you only have to look at a map of the two countries to see the obvious!
Posted by: David Duff | Tuesday, 10 April 2012 at 12:13
But you only had to look at the maps of the British, French, Dutch and Belgian Empires to see that Hitler's Germany had no chance. Hindsight, Duffers, hindsight.
Posted by: dearieme | Tuesday, 10 April 2012 at 21:34
Not like you to be silly, DM! The only 'operating empire' was the British one because in all those other cses the 'Mother Country' was occupied and the colonialists cut their own deals according to their circs. Thus, the French in IndoChina helped the Japs. And none of the empire countries, ours or theirs, were in the slightest position of being able to overthrow Hitler. Also remember that there were always more than willing 'Quisling' governments to aid the Germans in holding down occupied countries.
If Japan had not attacked Pearl Harbour and had avoided the Philippines would America have joined the war effort? The main requirements for the Japs was rubber (Malaya) and oil (Dutch East Indies). If they had confined themselves to that and avoided everything else would America have entered the war?
Posted by: David Duff | Tuesday, 10 April 2012 at 22:40