Blog powered by Typepad

« Now this doesn't shock me at all! | Main | The man had balls as well as a brain! »

Tuesday, 17 July 2012

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Excellent post, DD, and there are frustrating and really disturbing aspects alongside the humour.

In Further Education, for example, we sometimes encounter 16 year old students who have been diagnosed with a variety of "syndromes" and disorders which are basically a free pass for any kind of bad behaviour. These are kids who in effect are allowed to threaten teaching staff and other students with the tools of their chosen trade, and to have foul-mouthed temper tantrums, just because their psychologist has deemed them to be a victim of their condition.

My favourite is "O.D.D.". "Oppositional Defiant Disorder". You probably think I'm joking, but check it out:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppositional_defiant_disorder

They have their own support groups, websites, etc. To any sane person, this looks like a fancy name for being a disruptive little shit...

Well done, 'W', a new disorder - DLS syndrome!

"...tens of thousands of people who formerly were reduced to having to pull up their socks and get on with their lives..."

Autism, ME, ADD, etc etc etc.

I long ago observed that the only people who suffer from these things are those who can afford to; those who can't (or whose families can't afford it) get a swipe round the back of the head and told to get on with it.

"I long ago observed that the only people who suffer from these things are those who can afford to ..."

Have you ever noticed that only rich women suffer from Munchausen by Proxy Disorder? Poor women who harm their children are sent to jail.

Andrew and Dom, it was ever thus.

Although, I suppose I should add a rider to the effect that there really are such things as mental/physical disorders which are deserving of medical treatment. Alas, they are frequently ill-served by the psychobabbling fraternity.

"In Further Education, for example, we sometimes encounter 16 year old students who have been diagnosed with a variety of "syndromes" and disorders which are basically a free pass for any kind of bad behaviour. These are kids who in effect are allowed to threaten teaching staff and other students with the tools of their chosen trade, and to have foul-mouthed temper tantrums, just because their psychologist has deemed them to be a victim of their condition.

My favourite is "O.D.D.". "Oppositional Defiant Disorder". You probably think I'm joking, but check it out:"

Psychiatrists, surely.

They're the ones getting the big bucks to prescribe those eye waveringly expensive meds 'Big Pharma' is pumping out. Those are the people I'd be challenging if I were you but for some reason nobody ever does that. It's like blaming the foot soldiers and leaving the generals alone. The most resource intensive 'mental illnesses' in 'young adults' are the eating disorders and a fair proportion of those are private school brats. Just saying.

Hello, Louise, good to hear from you again. There used to be a 'witty' saying which summed up the difference between psychiatrists and psychologists but for the life of me I can't remember it which is why I tend, rather sloppily, to bung them all in under the heading of "psychobabblers". When it comes to investigations of the mind I think the quacks are at the leeches stage once considered the very latest medical science in medieval times!

Here are a few things psychologists cannot do:

1. They cannot forcibly medicate you:

"I had my revenge however, I ordered her to be held down and injected in the buttock"

2.  They cannot force treatment upon you against your will unless they have the permission of a psychiatrist.

3. They cannot imprison you.

4. They cannot get you off a murder charge by invoking the insanity defence.

Big Pharma may be to blame for lots of seriously undesirable stuff but is the psychiatrist who is the essential intermediary.  Psychiatrists are probably the most powerful "doctors" in the medical profession.  They have an unjustified hegemony over the other medical specialisms and are (rightly) resented for this.  

They have more power than a wirchfinder general.

But don't listen to me: I'm nuts.

If you're nuts, Louise, where does that put me? However, you very definitely know where-of you speak and I appreciate your views.

The comments to this entry are closed.