I confess immediately that when it comes to North Korea I rely utterly on those shrewd fellows at NightWatch who kindly sent me their overnight assessment of the New Year speech given by Kim III. (There have been three Kims running the dump since WWII and to avoid confusion, well, I get confused at any rate, I will number them.) There has been a minor flurry of excitement in the MSM for two reasons. First, that Kim III actually gave a live New Year speech at all because his father, Kim II, never did. However, my 'NightHawks' tell me that the reason Kim II never spoke was because he had a high-pitched woman's voice that might actually have raised a few laughs in that miserable dump of a country! The other reason for excitement was a mention in the speech of an end to confrontation with South Korea. However, my 'NightHawks' assure me that it was almost an afterthought in the speech and was only mentioned as an adjunct to Kim's urgent encouragement to the workers to produce a badly-needed economic miracle! That is likely to have been met not by giggles but by yawns (in private, of course!) because when do political leaders ever stop encouraging workers to work more?
The bulk of the speech concentrated on real matters, or real-politik, if you like, in that Kim III has obviously cast his lot in with the Party rather than the military. The people were urged to put their confidence and their weight behind the Party which was, is and will forever be the supreme arbiter of the nation's affairs. All those hideous, emaciated, be-medalled generals with their ridiculous ex-Soviet hats which are big enough to land a helicopter on, had better watch out. Or perhaps plump little Kim III should watch his step even closer! Anyway, the 'NightHawks' sum it up thus:
The message to the outside world appears to be a plea for forbearance while domestic issues get settled. Kim's detractors do not share that view. They think that provocation and tension promote the safety and security of the North Korean state.
Sounds like 'interesting times' - and we know what their Chinese neighbours say about that!
Ahoy, Duffers - a piece relating to Oor Wullie.
http://www.slate.com/articles/life/the_spectator/2012/12/should_i_go_to_grad_school_ron_rosenbaum_explains.single.html
Posted by: dearieme | Thursday, 03 January 2013 at 13:02
Fascinating but I would lean towards Shapiro. When I directed 'Hamlet' I discovered all that stuff about their being two versions of the play and I decided on the later one although I kept in the "How all occasions..." simply because it is beautiful and also that I knew my audience would expect it - well, hell, it is 'show business' after all! I once read, or tried to read, Peter Brook's book on theatre but gave up as it was incomprehensible! I never saw any of his productions but, as you might put it, 'I hae ma doots'. I suspect that his productions were more concerned with Peter Brooks than Will Shakespeare!
I agree with him concerning university courses in things like literature. I am delighted, in retrospect, that my idleness at school pre-empted any chances of me attending university because when, in middle-age, I rediscovered old Will, I came to him fresh and without the preconceptions of some professor drilled into my brain. Instead, I tried to read as many critiques and essays as possible in order to try and make up my own mind what was in his mind. A hideously difficult task, of course, but I always did try to 'serve the writer'.
Posted by: David Duff | Thursday, 03 January 2013 at 15:09
In the offchance you wish to be a Norkie-Watcher - here's probably the best place to source a "reasonably" steady stream. (There is an editorial up currently on the speech Mr. McCreary analyzed in NW.)
http://www.dailynk.com/english/index.php
Just my opinion but, NK is simply China's rabid dog sitting on China's front porch. Whenever the CCP (and for whatever inscrutable motive) China want's whatever - the CCP tasers whichever rabid Kim is then on the porch.
China could I think - if they wanted to - easily neuter Chihuahua Kim.
Posted by: JK | Thursday, 03 January 2013 at 17:12
To some of us, JK, the NORKs will always be this mob.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATJjP3Dzsfw
Posted by: dearieme | Thursday, 03 January 2013 at 19:21
JK, I don't think too many people know anything with any degree of certainty about NK but thanks for the link.
Well done, DM, trust you to come up with a winner!
Posted by: David Duff | Thursday, 03 January 2013 at 21:18
Reading this blog is really an honor. It seems that the words that used here are really deep and Its really amazing because i can understand a little about the story madhouse wrapped. :)
Posted by: Campus Security Software | Friday, 25 January 2013 at 15:52