Blog powered by Typepad

« We're all in it together - except Germany! | Main | The 'boy scouts' in the City follow their motto »

Tuesday, 12 November 2013


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Exactly what did this stupid woman think she was supporting when she supported obamacare, I wonder. She probably believed that only those richer than her would be asked to subsidize the others, probably subsidize her too. Well, we ran out of other people's money a lot sooner than you thought, bitch.

Ouch! Did she hit a nerve, Dom? Even so, she is double silly. First she thought 'Obamacare' was going to be cheap and cheerful, and then she though her fellow liberals would sympathise with her plight. Just how dumb do you have to be to write for the NYT?

You'd have to have a heart of stone not to laugh.

'Exactimento', DM!

I went to my local food purveyor the other day and encountered a young man standing outside handing out fliers asking patrons to petition management about changing their (workers belong to a union - i guess that union didn't get the exemption) hours and healthcare. He called it corporate greed. I asked if he voted for the bummer and when he said yes I told him he created his own hell. He was not appreciative.

"He was not appreciative."

By Jove, Miss Red, I do think you have mastered British understatement!

The comments to this entry are closed.