Regular readers will already be aware of my abysmal ignorance concerning the language of music. Not, mind you, that it stops me from enjoying an exceedingly wide range of music from jazz to classical plus the many genres in-between. Thus, I was delighted to read an essay by Mr. Gerald Elias at the Future Symphony Institute. (Hat tip to A&LDaily). Mr. Elias has an exceedingly distinguished history as an orchestral player, teacher and writer on all things classical music. His essay is knowledgeable, entertaining and fascinating. If, like me you wish you knew more about classical music, then click on the link and learn some more.
Excellent article, David, and very entertaining. It's always a regret that recording came along too late to capture the great historical figures of music.
Posted by: mike fowle | Friday, 06 October 2017 at 09:40
Glad you enjoyed it, Mike, but can you imagine attending that first performance of Beethoven's Fifth?
Posted by: David Duff | Friday, 06 October 2017 at 09:54
Gerald Elias's points are all good. Anyone interested can find famous pieces of classical music performed on reproductions of period instruments in "original" style. I've bought a few myself and always found them disappointing. Modern instruments and techniques are simply better than what could be achieved 200 years ago.
Here's the 5th performed on period instruments, but by players with much higher average skill than those of Ludwig's time. Judge for yourself:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cezml4PEpbc
Posted by: Bob | Friday, 06 October 2017 at 16:00
At the time of the Great Composers like Mozart and Beethoven, wasn't it widely believed among the Upper Crust musical experts that the common person was incapable of hearing, much less comprehending, the complexities and subtleties of the Great Composers?
Posted by: Whitewall | Friday, 06 October 2017 at 16:41
Bob et al.,
On the other hand, the first performance of Beethoven's 9th was sensational:
Oh to have seen that event!Posted by: TheBigHenry | Friday, 06 October 2017 at 16:50
Henry,
The 9th wasn't universally praised during its time:
...with its mysterious opening, pounding Scherzo and magnificent hymn known as "Ode to Joy," Beethoven's Ninth was not a runaway best seller when it was first performed in 1824 and even throughout the 19th Century.
"Monstrous," thundered a respected critic of Beethoven's day.
"...very much like Yankee Doodle," sniffed a Providence, R.I. newspaper in 1868.
"Unspeakable cheapness," declared Boston's Musical Record in 1899.
I couldn't find it searching the web, but remember reading about a critic of his time describing Beethoven's music sounding like a bag full of hammers falling down stairs. You can't please everyone.
Posted by: Bob | Friday, 06 October 2017 at 19:08
The material above is from:
http://blog.oregonlive.com/classicalmusic/2008/09/beethovens_ninth_kicks.html
Posted by: Bob | Friday, 06 October 2017 at 19:10
When it comes to musical criticism I have already issued a caveat in the admission that I am none to clear as to the difference between a crotchet and a quaver! Even so, I will dare to aim one tiny piece of lèse-majesté in the direction of Herr Beethoven. Is he not, sometimes, a tad repetitive? Just when you think he has come to the end of a passage, suddenly he's off again and then again, and then yet again!
Jes' sayin'!
Posted by: David Duff | Friday, 06 October 2017 at 20:35
David,
I would say Ravel's "Bolero" is a bit repetitive. Big Ludwig, not so much.
____________________
Bob,
Posted by: TheBigHenry | Friday, 06 October 2017 at 23:55
Repetitive? To an extent, yes, but you have to bear in mind that he was writing for a time when people could only hear a work once with probably a long interval before they got to hear it again. Perhaps our lives are filled with so much stuff that we resent anything that goes on a bit, even if most of what we do is pretty inconsequential.
Posted by: mike fowle | Saturday, 07 October 2017 at 06:54
Don't misunderstand me, I am not suggesting that Ludwig resorted to constant use of ostinato, only that in some passages, just when you think it has reached a climax - suddenly he's off again! I almost get the impression that he's loving that theme so much he can't bear to let it go!
Posted by: David Duff | Saturday, 07 October 2017 at 08:21