In one of my wilder mental vagaries I used to wonder if there was a factory in southern California where they actually manufactured all those long-legged, big-breasted, blonde bimbos for which there is an insatiable - and apparently 'insatiable' is the right word - demand in Hollywood. I imagined huge vats filled with silicon being slowly and automatically stirred before being poured into life-sized moulds which were then activated by a 'yuuuuuge' charge of electricity so that the walking-talking products actually appeared to be almost human!
I am now beginning to have similar dreams - or perhaps 'nightmares' is more accurate - concerning the increasing number of totally stupid 'wimmin' who keep appearing in increasing numbers on the fringes of my life. Is there, I ask myself, a factory somewhere on this 'septic Isle' which is churning them out in what appears to be their thousands? Of course, I can hear you demanding some examples to illustrate my complaint, in which case, look no further than the Labour front bench in Parliament! There you will see, and if you're really slow in using your 'TV-do-flicker-thingie' you may actually hear them, too - oh the horror, the horror! Just think - Dianne Abbot or Emily Thornberry or Yvette Cooper - see what I mean?
Today, alas, The Mail introduces us to another example of the truly brain dead in the form of Ms. Sarah Hall. Unlike most of the silly, old trouts on the Labour front bench, this lady is rather attractive:
She is a housewife and mother from 'oooooop north' - yeeeeeeees, quite! - and judging by her opinions something went badly wrong in the factory that produced her. I will let her own words, as reported in The Mail, express her opinion:
A mother has demanded her six-year-old son's school bans Sleeping Beauty because the princess does not give consent to be kissed.
Sarah Hall, from Northumberland Park, North Shields, claimed the fairytale promotes an 'inappropriate sexual' message to young children.
She argued the story is irresponsible because it teaches children it is acceptable to kiss women while they are asleep.
The mother of two said: 'I think it's a specific issue in the Sleeping Beauty story about sexual behaviour and consent. 'It's about saying is this still relevant, is it appropriate?'
Ms Hall is worried about what message the tale, which features a Prince waking up a Princess by kissing her, sends to impressionable youngsters.
How will Ms. Hall cope when her precious 'likkle kiddie-winkie' is introduced to Shakespeare? All that rape and pillage and eating meat pies containing the flesh of your own children. I fear for Ms. Hall's sanity, well, actually, I'm already worried about it!
Wait until she hears about "Beauty and the Beast". Even downloading those images can get you into serious trouble.
Posted by: Whyaxye | Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 17:25
"I used to wonder if there was a factory in southern California where they actually manufactured all those long-legged, big-breasted, blonde bimbos"
Well David, as it happens yes there is - a factory I mean - & in California:
https://www.duffelblog.com/2017/11/saudi-arabia-beheads-first-female-robot-citizen/
Place your orders quick though David, they're considering an export ban!
Posted by: JK | Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 18:29
Having a misspent youth at the age of five to ten growing up with the likes of Noddy, Muffin the Mule (am I allowed to say that) Just William, Billy Bunter, Desperate Dan (that conjures up connotations that are hard to live with). How does a princess who has been asleep for a hundred years being brought back to consciousness by an unrequited kiss cause offence other than to a cretin of the first order. With a bit of luck she will be molested by a frog and go to sleep until I have departed her demented world.
Posted by: Peter Whale | Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 19:49
It could be she got an idea into her head to promote herself and get of benefits..
Posted by: jimmy glesga | Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 20:01
David,
The gratuitous violence and sexism displayed in this one short cartoon clip is absolutely intolerable. Any children exposed to such material risk being emotionally scarred for life!
Shocking I tell you, quite shocking!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkSjwGpWxtw
Posted by: Richard | Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 20:02
Richard, Traumatic!
I laughed a good one!
Posted by: Whitewall | Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 20:14
Whitewall, went to the Saturday morning matinee every week to be traumstised by Tom & Jerry and Batman & Robin. Have been getting councelling for 60 years.
Posted by: jimmy glesga | Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 21:19
Richard,
That clip is also offensively racist. Tom's rival in love is black, lives on the streets, is sexually aggressive, and keen to mate with the pretty white cat.
Posted by: Whyaxye | Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 23:01
Hey Jimmy. I remember seeing Tom & Jerry and similar prior to features at drive-in movie theaters way back when. I seem to have turned out ok......
Posted by: Whitewall | Friday, 24 November 2017 at 00:08
Duffers old chap you might want to have a chat with your occulist.
She's bloody hideous.
Posted by: Cuffleyburgers | Friday, 24 November 2017 at 06:59
She's one of those that by the time you've drunk enough to fancy her you're barely capable of doing the deed (let alone getting your socks off)
Posted by: Cuffleyburgers | Friday, 24 November 2017 at 07:01
She's one of those that by the time you've drunk enough to fancy her you're barely capable of doing the deed
Shades of Bugis Street, Singapore, where you found the good looking ones were mostly boys. Not that I ever went there of course - off limits to Officers and you know how Australians respect those sort of restrictions.
Bugis Street is probably not on the radar of "the cousins". More a Commonwealth thingie.
Posted by: AussieD | Friday, 24 November 2017 at 08:51
AussieD, I remember an evening drinking with some Aussie soldiers in Bugis Street and being totally amazed at how many times the F-word could be inserted into a single sentence. To be honest, it made the sentence so long I had forgotten the beginning, er, but that might have been something to do with the number of Tiger beers consumed!
As to the lady above, I stick to my original judgment, an attractive and elegant lady even if she is as thick as a plank!
Posted by: David Duff | Friday, 24 November 2017 at 09:00
Whitewall, you are strictly non PC. Evidently, you were scarred for life by Tom and Jerry. I too used to watch them and I am similarly damaged.
Thank goodness.
Posted by: Mayfly | Friday, 24 November 2017 at 10:23
Mayfly,
we "damaged types" must stick together. Wait for those others to 'sort themselves out'.
Posted by: Whitewall | Friday, 24 November 2017 at 12:13
Well as it happens AussieD, at least a squad-size (14) of *my naval operators "apparently" (at least their stories were remarkably consistent) "had knowledge" of the area.
Of course all I knew of the environs was, vicariously learned.
As you say, "officers respected limits."
Posted by: JK | Friday, 24 November 2017 at 19:28
JK, I think I may have mentioned this before but I still remember vividly visiting the Military Police base in Singapore city - no I wasn't 'nicked', it was business. Anyway, an American aircraft carrier had docked and the place was full of USN Shore Patrol readying themselves for the evening 'fun 'n' games'. I can honestly say that I have never seen such a collection of tremendously 'yuuuuuuuuge' men. What the hell does your navy feed them on?
Posted by: David Duff | Friday, 24 November 2017 at 19:47
What the hell does your navy feed them on? Navy Beans and ham.
Posted by: Whitewall | Friday, 24 November 2017 at 20:13
But, Whiters, I distinctly remember a Dean Martin/Jerry Lewis film from yonks ago which had a song in it, the main line of which was, "The navy gets the gravy and the army gets the beans"!
Posted by: David Duff | Friday, 24 November 2017 at 21:16
DD; What the hell does your navy feed them on?
Lots & lots of meat and potatoes.
Posted by: Up2L8 | Saturday, 25 November 2017 at 07:44
A Navy Thanksgiving:
https://strategypage.com/military_photos/2017112419252.aspx
Posted by: Whitewall | Saturday, 25 November 2017 at 13:27
Well David, I don't know what we feeds 'em but
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6filPCtrt0c
Posted by: JK | Saturday, 25 November 2017 at 22:09
JK, I'm told that lighthouses are notoriously difficult to steer.
Posted by: Whitewall | Saturday, 25 November 2017 at 22:23
JK, thanks for that link, started my day with a chuckle!
Posted by: David Duff | Sunday, 26 November 2017 at 08:07