DUFF & NONSENSE!

Biden is a racist

Sleepy Joe just called one of his staffers, a 48 year old black man, "boy" ...

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-calls-black-adviser-boy

Biden is a full-on died-in-the-wool Dem racist.  He lost the battle to enslave blacks, lost the battle to segregate them, and now he privileges them merely to garner their votes, while underneath the privilege facade his wool is died the same as it ever was.

The slip-ups are just too regular to be passed off as anything else.  The "If you don't vote for me you ain't black" blurt, the one where he said "Poor kids are just as bright and talented as white kids", and now a straightforward racist slur.

I don't know why he doesn't just come straight out with it like Lyndon Johnson, Dem president, in 1965 ...

"I'm gonna have those niggers voting Dem for 200 years".

Here's MSNBC acknowledging Johnson's full-on blend of racism-with-privilege character and politics ...

https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/lyndon-johnson-civil-rights-racism-msna305591 

Shame MSNBC and the rest of the Left media can't acknowledge Biden is out of the same mould - and the entire BLM, Antifa, Woke apparat as well.

SoD

UPDATE #1

Jeez, I hadn't watched the actual footage when I wrote the above.  It's actually worse than I envisaged.  Unlike the "Poor kids ..." comment there's no correction, no expansion to dilute the damage, not even realisation.  One can only conclude that the only thing progressive about Biden is his dementia.  This is, quite literally, a demented racist in full flow, "busier than the devil" ... 

UPDATE #2

Oh, and btw, as you might expect: CNN, BBC, and the Left Axis media crew nowhere to be seen.  Just imagine if the Don or one of his team had said something like that ...

https://www.google.com/search?q=biden+calls+adviser+boy&tbm=nws

 

Goodbye Taliban, hello Mujahideen

If ever the Realpolitik adage "Your enemy's enemy is your friend" needed a real world example it is the opportunity, yes opportunity, that now presents itself in central Asia.

Let's raise the telescope to our eye, and through the fog of war scan the enemy's battle line and list their contingents on this field of glory - clockwise from North ...

- Russia

- China

- Pakistan

- Iran

All four of them fear the Taliban for various reasons: all have deep vulnerabilities to the Taliban.

Vlad is terrified of renewed conflict in the Stan's, his south eastern "near abroad" buffer zone.  Connecting to Islamist groups in the Stan's would be straightforward for the Taliban to achieve and a bloody thorn in Vlad's side.

Ping-a-Ling is fearful of the same: Taliban and Uyghur Islamism in collaboration.

"It's not cricket" Khan has beaten the Pakistan Taliban for now while simultaneously supporting the Afghan Taliban and taking development and anti-terrorism support from the West!  In the world of Realpolitik that's an A*, you have to say.  But in the Great Game everything has changed now and all bets are off.  It's ding-ding round 2 - or round 22 more like - and there is no reason why a victorious Afghan Taliban cannot revisit the quarter lost to "It's not cricket" Khan.

The Mad Mullahs are the Taliban's greatest infidel enemy, the Shia splitters from the true Sunni Islam, and with a pesky minority in Afghanistan that the Taliban would do well to oppress and isolate from Iranian influence.

And turning the telescope to our own battle line, who's there? ...

- Turkey

- Saudi Arabia and the Emirates

Well, there's a gift!  Dirty Erdy and the Camel Boys are all Sunni and thereby the brethren of the Taliban!  That makes it easier.

So what's to do and how to do it?

Firstly, swallow pride, suppress emotion, step away from the event, and let is pass into the mere status quo of history.  You got beat.  Get over it and don't be a Shushka.

Secondly, opium.  Immediately the whole of the West needs to reduce the local price of heroin to zero by putting a dispenser machine outside every newsagent, GP surgery, pharmacy, and hospital, whereby you simply press the button and your baggy drops into the tray, like a bag of crisps or a Snickers bar, absolutely free of charge.  That will destroy the domestic heroin drug trafficking industry stone dead.  It is the only known way to kill a market: reduce the price to zero.

To supply the dispenser machines the West needs to buy the poppy crop of Afghanistan, or at least, as much of it as is required to sate the domestic usage.  That buys us huge influence with the Taliban, we will be their biggest customer.

And then there's the surplus heroin we don't need, and here's the rub: this one's a leaf right out of the pages of the British Empire: allow and encourage the supply of heroin to Vlad, Ping-a-Ling, and "It's not cricket" Khan.  But let them keep paying full whack street price.

Blighty already pulled this trick with Ping-a-Ling's crew way back when, as said.  We rubber ducked them up big time with this one.  They're addictive people, gambling, getting high, they're mad for it up for it.  Here's a little piccie from the past to remind you ...

https://www.wikiwand.com/en/History_of_opium_in_China

The Rooskies, Chinks and Pak's are deeply conservative societies unlikely to be able to lever the Liberal ethos required to take the logic to its conclusion: you destroy a market by reducing the price to zero.  They won't be fitting smack dispensing machines in public places any time soon.  And even if they do, they'll be buying at the Taliban's street price until they can get a poppy crop of their own going.  Their societies will be wrecked and their economy too as they pay "top whack for smack" into the bargain.

Thirdly, get those Talib chaps au fait with the oodles of mil kit we've left behind, and get them busy doing nasty in the Stan's, Xinxiang province, and Pakistan.  There's great synergy here with step two: the heroin smuggling routes where all the wonga is made are the same routes down which the Talibs will be going to do the nasty.  The smugglers need security and the Talibs are it, and the Talibs need covert passage and networks and the smugglers are it.  Nice.  See that smug grin wiped off "It's not cricket" Khan's fizzog in round 2 (or 22) - double nice.

Fourthly, we need to embrace the Taliban as our prime actor against ISIS and more extreme Islamist groups.  The Talibs hate them already, so this one's a no brainer.  "There shall be no-one more extreme than the Taliban".  We'll take that now.  So let's back it up.  The synergy with the weaponry left behind in Afghanistan is obvious.  Any Talibs wanting some foreign service in Africa against Boko Haram, or with the Hairies in Syria against Assad and Vlad, or in Yemen against AQ: speak to Dirty Erdy and the Camel Boys and roll-up roll-up!

Fifthly, and last but not least, some PR and positioning with the domestic audience.  Can't be without PR these days of course, and the Taliban need a rebranding.  From now on they are to be called the Mujahideen once again.  Nice retro spin with plenty of preserved value, we are conservatives after all.

And from a positioning perspective, we need to acknowledge and project that Dirty Erdy and the Camel Boys are at least as nasty to the Laydeez and devoid of human rights, possibly more so, than the Taliban after 20 years of having had nail bars, beauty parlours, kids tranny clinics, chicks with dicks in girls changing rooms, and Save the Whales offices (or is it "Save the Cats and Dogs"? - what a Shushka that Pen Farthing bloke is) thrust upon them.  If Dirty Erdy and the Camel Boys are our friends then the Mujahideen are welcome.  If you served and gave over these 20 years it was not in vain: none of the above would be possible without your sacrifice, particularly the comparatively moderate Taliban of today versus two decades ago.

Of course, Dirty Erdy, the Camel Boys, and Mujahideen are not our friends.  They are our enemies' enemies.  When our current enemies are destroyed these friends will become our enemies and we will destroy them too - if we haven't worn them down with nail bars, beauty parlours, kids tranny clinics, etc. etc. and assimilated them into us by then.

Well there it is.

Sound like a plan?

SoD

What a rout looks like

I was routed today.  Around 500BC, give or take.  My Greek Hoplites vs the Persians.  It didn't seem possible that anything other than total victory would be the outcome as my glittering phalanxes of bronze clad heroes marched onto the field of glory.

I went for the central position.  Screw the flanks, punch the centre of the Persian line, shoulder-to-shoulder, a phalanx of phalanxes as wide as it was deep.  What's he gonna do with no centre and two divided armies flailing about at the peripheries?

Hostilities commenced at 11am, it didn't take long.  This was the view of the centre of my line from where I was sitting facing East, my line almost at my opponent's edge of the table, the Persian immortals clinging to bitter life on the green hill to the right, the rest fleeing to the rear next to the orange tape measure.  That's mini-me, the Greek C-in-C, on the circular base slightly to the right of centre ...

But you can see the tell tale signs of disaster even here in the centre.  My two units of light infantry, the archer's and slingers at the rear closest to the camera, in reserve having done their job of soaking up the Persian missile fire to protect the Hoplite phalanxes as the they plodded forward, start turning to the North.

The North is dire, they were all around us, flank attacks, rear attacks, missile fire against unshielded unarmoured sides and backs, and now everyone left of centre is Persian, my North flank is collapsing southwards into my rear centre ...

And then the South, same gut-wrenching sight, the Persians even taking the time to form a multi-unit line to start the second pincer movement into my right ...

I about faced my rear rank of units in the centre, and tried to fold them outwards North and South, like the leaves out from under a kitchen table, the hoots of derision from my opponents ringing in my ear, "We're playing Cannae next month, can't you wait another 300 years?!", the frantic arguments with my left and right commanders, "Keep pushing, finish the centre and the rest will follow!" they implored.  "No!  I can do both!"  I retorted.

And then, and then, and then ... my phalanxes bounced from the immortals on the hill.

It was over in minutes.

The reinvigorated Persians swarmed in from the flanks, pelting everything with arrow, slingshot and javelin, and the heavy Hoplites couldn't flee quick enough.

I threw in the towel at 230pm, 2 hours before going home time.  It wasn't even a rout, the whole effing lot was in the Kesselschlacht.

A very sad day for the West today.  Oh, and I lost a wargame.

SoD

Gramsci sch-wamsci

This is probably true, girls are cleverer than boys ...

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/08/11/girls-set-increase-gcse-lead-boys-should-accept-cleverer/

Girls are expected to increase their lead over their male peers in GCSEs, with an expert saying we should “just accept that they are cleverer”.

But what an extraordinary thing for a wokie to say "We should just accept that they are cleverer".

Would they say,  "We should just accept that white people are cleverer than black people" because they outperform them at school too?

This is classic Gramsci from the culture warriors: the truth state changes depending on local circumstances: racist / sexist when we want it to be, and not when we don't.

SoD

Now *this* is proper racism, red in tooth and claw

Utterly incredible this one ...

https://www.foxnews.com/us/atlanta-federal-complaint-segregation-race 

 

Posey said that the practice was put in place last year at Mary Lin Elementary School by principal Sharyn Briscoe, who is also Black.

Posey explained that Black students were put in two classes with two different teachers, while White students were put in six classes with six different teachers.

She found out about the segregation when she asked Briscoe to place her child with a teacher who she thought would be a good fit, she recalled to the news outlet.

"She said that’s not one of the Black classes, and I immediately said, ‘What does that mean?’ I was confused. I asked for more clarification. I was like, ‘We have those in the school?’ And she proceeded to say, ‘Yes. I have decided that I’m going to place all of the Black students in two classes,’" Posey recounted of her conversation with Briscoe.

So that's segregation in schools, the exact thing that the Dem party used to do after they couldn't do slavery any more and before they started privileging black people with anti-white racism.

In plain view.

And the deed done by a black person.

And so I turn to the google news tab thinking "Nooo, shorely shome mishtake" and simply type the Mum's name to find some corroboration.  And this is what I get ...

https://www.google.com/search?q=kila+posey&tbm=nws

 

The Daily Mail and New York Post.  The only English speaking MSM doing their job.  CNN, BBC, and all the rest - either airbrushed by them or google.  The Foxnews article itself - airbrushed by google.

We really are in dire straits, chaps and chapesses.

SoD

Update:  Search on the BBC site - airbrushed ...

Search on the CNN site - airbrushed ...

So that's all 3 of them:  Google, BBC, and CNN, airbrushing in concert.

Equity - Gramsci, you bastard

This picture is sooo irritating isn't it? ...

Why are the people black / brown?  It's the same in nearly all of the google images of the same cheesy depiction ...

https://www.google.com/search?q=equity&tbm=isch

It's so patronising, blatantly racist in fact.  It's saying "Black and brown people need Equity, not anyone else".

Equity is not privilege.  It's not something that's granted on the basis of race, creed, gender, identity, or any other category of human beings.  The sole criteria of Equity is income.  If you don't have the income to afford "the things without which harm will come to you", like food, clothing, shelter, health, education, energy, information, and transport, then Equity is there for all equally, irrespective of race, creed, gender, identity.  It isn't a racist, sexist, hetero-phobic privilege, like job quotas and worthless university degrees.

It may be that when you do Equity properly on the basis of income you find certain categories of people over or under represented.  So what?  The job has been done.  They're no longer suffering, whoever they are.  And if you are peculiarly worried about a category of people, well, they've been picked up in greater proportion if they were in greater proportion.  So your racist, sexist, hetero-phobic peccadillos need not surface to piss off the rest of us.

The Left Axis has appropriated and distorted this Libertarian concept just like it appropriated and distorted the word Liberal.  Instead of a term compatible with Equality under the umbrella of Liberty, it is now a term denoting arbitrary privilege.  A fresh addition to the lexicon of authoritarianism today, like the word Liberal that was added in times past.

Equity was a vitally important word for the Left Axis to appropriate in modern times.  In the hands of the Right it would have spelt an end to the statist empires and civic agencies dominated by the Left Axis, packed as they are with wokies, BLM, Antifa, green blobbers, and all manner of oxygen thieves on privilege quotas with worthless university degrees.  In the hands of the Right it was the very Alt-State itself: quite literally a state bypass, the means by which to eliminate need and preserve individual freedom.

It is no surprise that the Right of the Tory party, the folks like Iain Duncan Smith who wince at BoJo's blue socialist agenda, were the pioneers of Universal Credit; UC being the first baby step towards the full and proper instantiation of Equity, agnostic of race, creed, gender, identity, or any other category of human beings, namely UBI (Universal Basic Income).  They saw it as the tool of the Right that it was, backed up by Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, Hayek and Friedman.

Little wonder Gramsci's descendants appropriated Equity.  The nice sounding words of the Right that get votes and deliver real prosperity for all with individual freedom needed appropriating and distorting.  Liberal and Equity didn't stand a chance.

The sooner the Right in America re-appropriate Equity the better.  Call it "Negative Income Tax" if you wish to take the sting out of its currently appropriated association with the Left Axis.  That re-associates it with Ronnie and Maggie's ideological leading light Milton Friedman who actually coined the phrase, so the wrinklies on the Right don't choke on it - like the word Liberal was swapped for Libertarian in Right circles when it was lost to the Left.

If your enemy wants it, stop him getting it.  Do anything, but do not lose this word.

SoD

Han man

A good read on the motivations of Ping-a-Ling and the Han crew in and around the borders of China - roves across the surface of all motivations, even tectonic plates! ...

https://unchartedterritories.tomaspueyo.com/p/what-china-wants

The timeless Putin-esque formula: export Han peeps into states to gain majorities, think buffer zones, spheres of influence.

One wonders if enticing them into Afghanistan might be a good strategy?

They're about the only state in the world that has the will to continue doing to Islamism what needs doing to it, and in so doing if they get quagmired that's two pluses for the West.

But on the other hand, being gangsters themselves they might just make a fist of it with the locals and their mob.  We might face another belligerent pro-China buffer state, puppet-mastered from Beijing and able to jab a thorn in our side like North Korea, but with human bombs instead of rockets, and all laundered away with the "Nothing to do with us, speak to Kabul" proxy rinser.

My court's still out on that one.

And of course it's not as if Uncle Sam isn't similarly minded with thoughts of buffer zones and spheres of influence, and Ping-a-Ling likewise keen to prod and poke them ...

https://www.google.com/search?q=china+cuba+relations&tbm=nws

Any of those links will do: how China is fiercely backing the incumbent Socialists in Havana, and how Sleepy Joe is living up to his name and missing a sure-fire opportunity to knock out the Havana Socialists with a revolution and thereby shore up the US buffer zone - and poke Ping-a-Ling in the eye by giving him a foreign policy failure.

The Don would have seized that opportunity with both hands, and added it to his list of foreign policy achievements: Rocket Man back in his silo, the Mad Mullahs eviscerated, the Kurds and Old Hickory safe in Syria while Vlad, Assad, Dirty Erdy and the Hairies slaughter each other, Israel and the Arabs resuming normal relations with the first such agreement in 50 years.

Just counting down the days to the next US election ...

SoD